AI Rate Professor

English

Katrina Jalloh

ENGL103 · ENG72 · ENG103 · ENGL100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are comfortable with frequent writing, participation, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderEssay HeavyCaring PersonalityParticipation MattersMixed Teaching Quality
  • Students split sharply between caring and enjoyable experiences and .
  • Writing load and .
  • Recent reviews and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks difficult because , and effort not matching results.

, so all grade-effort evidence comes from in-person classes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material itself can feel manageable, but , and participation make the class feel heavier for writing-averse students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important, and one review warns that skipping class risks failing.

and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because , and weak responsiveness outweigh praise for her personality.

, and the tone is strongly mixed with recent negative comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Several students call her a tough or and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is writing-heavy, with , and group projects.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Students often like her personality, but reviews criticize boring lectures, , and inconsistent teaching value.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person and shows a polarizing class with caring personality but , and .

Main concern

Heavy essay expectations and .

What students said

“ will not pay off.”
ENGL100
“The essays felt as if they were back to back”
ENG103
“Professor Jalloh is such a kind and caring person!”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ will not pay off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

22/100

“Only thing is that she grades late and grades tough.”

📚 Writing Load

30/100

“The essays felt as if they were back to back”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ and funny but as a professor she was just okay.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • will not pay off.
  • Only thing is that she grades late and grades tough.
  • She lets us turn in small things late and she answers questions

Theme 2

📝 About Essays and Workload

  • The essays felt as if they were back to back
  • Great professor , lots of essays but overall fair .
  • Participation is important in this class, as well as .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Professor Jalloh is such a kind and caring person!
  • She is truly an amazing teacher who teaches with simplicity but you really learn so much.
  • She is funny but I feel like the things we do are boring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

and older terms provide enough evidence, though student experiences are polarized.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1034 reviews
ENG722 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGL1032 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2