AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sienna Romo

NRSG220 · NRSG210 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want rigorous clinical growth and can handle high expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding Clinical InstructorStrong FeedbackTough LoveCaring MentorSelf-Directed Expectations
  • Students consistently describe Romo as very demanding but growth-focused.
  • and often helps students improve quickly.
  • A minority of students felt the environment was harsh or too self-directed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly say she is not easy and expects serious clinical effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels challenging because she pushes critical thinking, preparation, and professional clinical standards.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and punctuality appear strict, with one student warning to never be late.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and feedback, but some strongly dislike the pressure and tone.

, and they are mostly positive with a few sharp negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students label her a , but several still earned A grades through strong effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload is heavy because students describe many comments, preparation demands, and real clinical pressure.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students praise her guidance and feedback, though a few found her harsh or insufficiently supportive.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on , and preparation rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe a tough clinical and pushes serious growth.

Main concern

Her demanding style can feel harsh or unsupportive to some students.

What students said

“She challenges you to think further and has passion for her career.”
NRSG220
“She is not easy; expect to really put in the work.”
NRSG220
“expects you to figure things out yourself.”
nrsg210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is not easy; expect to really put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, rigor, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She made me a better critical thinker and student nurse.”

⚖️

30/100

“She is not easy; expect to really put in the work.”

👍 Recommendation Value

72/100

“She is an amazing instructor and you will grow immensely with her guidance.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She challenges you to think further and has passion for her career.
  • Her teachings on nursing interventions were unforgettable.
  • expects you to figure things out yourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Growth

  • She is not easy; expect to really put in the work.
  • she's demanding, and I mean really.
  • I learned how to care for patients wholeheartedly under her guidance.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Tone

  • She is compassionate and truly cares about the work she does.
  • .
  • unnecessarily cruel of an environment she creates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

, but there is no online evidence and opinions are somewhat polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NRSG2205 reviews
nrsg2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values