AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jason Hultman

MATH112 · MATH116 · MATH70 · MATH60 · MATH150 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
59.09%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Hultman can work if you are disciplined with homework and study guides, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing TeacherLots of HomeworkTest HeavyHelpful Study GuidesSelf-Teaching Risk
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find him helpful and students who say they had to teach themselves.
  • and often tied to paid access systems.
  • online calculus-style reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A is possible with , and persistence, but the workload and .

Online reviews make the A path look harder, while and partial credit can help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content is often difficult, and several students say lectures do not fully prepare them for .

Online reviews are more negative about self-teaching, while depending on course and student background.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

and some reviews describe it as required or closely watched.

, while online reviews emphasize note-taking and keeping up.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends heavily on learning style because some students praise his help while .

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive, while online reviews are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

He , and curves in some cases, but exams and as tough.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention partial credit and leniency more often, while and poor alignment.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy homework, with online reviews more likely to call it disconnected from tests.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is and helpful to boring, rushed, and insufficiently explanatory.

Format shift

In-person reviews are more balanced and often positive, while online reviews skew negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and study guides, with exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams, but and multiple tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, humor, and partial credit while others report boring lectures and .

Main concern

The workload is high and exams can be tough even when students like his teaching.

What students said

“ but doable if you study A LOT.”
MATH112
“You basically have to teach yourself in order to complete his homeworks.”
MATH116
“very lenient and ”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are , and exams that may not match the taught material.

Main concern

Students often say they had to teach themselves and handle a lot of homework.

What students said

“you have to teach yourself EVERYTHING.”
MATH112
“Be prepared to learn this material on your own.”
MATH116
“He gave a lot of homework, but the .”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy appears standard to somewhat tough, with multiple exams and study guides but .

Multiple ExamsFinal ExamStudy GuidesTough ExamsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides, multiple tests, a final, and some partial credit.

Multiple ExamsFinal ExamStudy GuidesTough ExamsPartial Credit
“1 Final, 5 Exams, 20 questions or less”
MATH70
“ but doable if you study A LOT.”
MATH112
“difficult exams but if he sees you attempted it”
MATH112

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy, but they report fair or .

Study GuidesFair ExamsExam-Material Mismatch
“He made the and gave us a study guide that .”
MATH150
“the class.”
MATH116
“He gives a lot of test.”
MATH116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but doable if you study A LOT.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He works through the problems step by step.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“He gave a lot of homework, but the .”

⚖️

50/100

“difficult exams but if he sees you attempted it”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and do all the work.
  • His lectures consist of him writing down the problems instead of explaining how to even do the work.
  • He is a great teacher. He works through the problems step by step.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but doable if you study A LOT.
  • Gives a lot of
  • very lenient and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Self-Teaching Risk

  • you have to teach yourself EVERYTHING.
  • Be prepared to learn this material on your own.
  • You basically have to teach yourself in order to complete his homeworks.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years and both formats provide detailed but strongly mixed evidence.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1127 reviews
MATH1165 reviews
MATH605 reviews
MATH703 reviews
MATH1502 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2