AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daniela Cortez

MATH26121 · MATH170 · MATH114 · MATH112S · MATH60 · MATH140 · MATH75 · MATH80A · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if , and a firm classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkTest heavyFast pacedInconsistent supportExtra credit sometimes
  • Most reviews describe a heavy workload with and test pressure.
  • clear lectures and many others reporting confusion or rude responses.
  • and study guides can help, but students still describe the class as stressful and hard to manage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Getting an A usually requires staying on top of and test preparation, though can help in some sections.

Both formats show high effort, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material feels harder because , and students often need outside study.

Online students report weaker lecture support, while and heavy practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

, but reviews do not consistently prove a .

Online reviews include scheduled Zoom meetings and independent formats, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Many students warn against taking her because of , and feeling unsupported.

Online recommendations are mostly negative, while strong supporters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Grades appear hard-earned because tests are weighted heavily and many students report struggling, though exists in some classes.

Format shift

, while online reviews emphasize exam weight and few graded items.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

as heavy, frequent, and stressful across many courses.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students praise her examples and lectures, but many describe her as .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on weak contact and recorded lectures, while and harsh classroom interactions.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly describe test-heavy grading, with .

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews repeatedly tag tests and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and harsh interactions despite some strong lecture praise.

Main concern

The main issue is a demanding workload paired with inconsistent patience and support.

What students said

“There is a lot of .”
MATH112S
“She moves through lectures and chapters super fast.”
MATH140
“LOTS of that bumped my grade.”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing limited professor , and weak lecture support.

Main concern

Students often felt they had to teach themselves while keeping up with and exams.

What students said

“I had about next to zero contact with this professor.”
MATH140
“Hw load is heavy, as .”
MATH75
“The only slight issue I had was that she assigns A LOT of assignments!”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are consistently described as difficult and heavily weighted, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyHeavily Weighted ExamsStudy Guides Sometimes ProvidedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, and study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policies.

Test HeavyStudy GuidesQuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“the ”
MATH140
“ but gives you a detailed study guide.”
MATH75

Online

Online reviews describe test-heavy courses and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test Heavy70% ExamsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“the courses weight is 70% exam 30% work.”
MATH140
“Hw load is heavy, as .”
MATH75

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If there is another professor .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She moves through lectures and chapters super fast.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“She gives tons of homework.”

⚖️ Grade Cost

34/100

“you really have to study and be on top of your work in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lectures that were easy to follow and understand.
  • If you ask questions during lecture she makes you feel as if you're asking a dumb question.
  • She uses real life scenarios to help students understand what she is teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • LOTS of that bumped my grade.
  • the
  • Most of the class was struggling to maintain a passing grade.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of .
  • she assigns A LOT of
  • Also a huge amount of homework that is somehow only worth 30%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 24 reviews across many years show consistent workload and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH1405 reviews
MATH755 reviews
MATH112S4 reviews
MATH1143 reviews
MATH603 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1702 reviews
MATH261211 review
MATH80A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2