AI Rate Professor

English

ANNA MORRISON

ENGLISH52 · ENG25191 · ENGL100 · AED48 · AED103 · ENG100 · ENGL100S · ENG103 · ENG21734 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you want a and , and discussion work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring ProfessorHeavy HomeworkEssay IntensiveClear InstructionsExtra Credit
  • Students often describe her as caring, helpful, patient, and .
  • The dominant complaint is heavy writing workload, with essays, journals, readings, and discussions due frequently.
  • Online reviews are more detailed and polarized, while in-person .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with and support, but students repeatedly say the amount of writing makes it hard to earn without steady effort.

Both formats show effort is required, with online reviews giving more and discussions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is standard English work, but the pace and volume of , and .

and discussions, while in-person ENG103 reviews emphasize fast pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do , but participation, discussions, videos, and regular work are central to success.

Online reviews stress weekly participation, while assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and clarity, but because the workload is too heavy.

Online reviews are sharply split between praise and workload complaints, while and less detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and late-work flexibility help, but workload-heavy grading and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention and late catch-up options more often, while .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews , and weekly assignments as the central burden.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, with online reviews giving the strongest and most repeated evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

She is commonly described as , and helpful, though some students find the class overwhelming or confusing.

Format shift

Online students give the clearest praise for videos and instructions, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is dominated , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats support an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

kindness but serious concern about fast pacing and heavy assignments in ENG103.

Main concern

Students , and assignments may struggle to recover.

What students said

“18 assignments I had to do in the first 2 weeks”
ENG103
“if you get behind it is really hard to catch up”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and , but many warn about heavy weekly writing and reading.

Main concern

The online workload can feel excessive if students are taking other demanding classes.

What students said

“There are a lot of discussions, such as two or more every week”
ENGL100
“She gives way too much .”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show an assignment-centered class with a final presentation of an essay and .

Final PresentationEssay-Based FinalNo Clear Exam Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, final, or closed-book exam rules.

Online

Online reviews mention a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Final PresentationEssay-Based Final
“ essay.”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but it is too much work, especially if you are taking full units.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“She was easy to reach out to and always provided .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“She gives way too much .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

58/100

“You definitely have to put in the work, but !”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Support

  • She was easy to reach out to and always provided .
  • She also does the most to help and breaks down the .
  • .

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • There are a lot of discussions, such as two or more every week, but you can very much get it done.
  • She gives way too much .
  • There and 3 writing assignments to complete Each Week.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • She allows you to catch up on most late homework, especially the ones with a high impact on grades.
  • She offers so .
  • if you get behind it is really hard to catch up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews include both online and , and repeated detailed workload themes.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1034 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
AED482 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
AED1031 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG217341 review
ENG251911 review
ENGL100S1 review
ENGLISH521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1