AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Deems Morrione

POL101 · POL280 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.24%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if , and want an engaging professor who makes the class feel worthwhile.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturerHilariousEngaging DiscussionsNotes MatterFair but Sometimes Strict
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his humor, passion, and ability to make political science engaging.
  • Success depends on attending, taking detailed notes, and completing the .
  • The course is usually manageable, but a few students , and limited chances to recover.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very reachable for students who attend, take notes, and complete assignments, but and .

Both formats reward attendance and notes, with and easy homework.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students say he keeps politics simple, engaging, and clear, though the pace can be fast and .

Online students describe recorded lectures and simple structure, while but fast lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because many students say going to class and taking notes are key to passing.

Online and in-person reviews both stress attending lectures, but no .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students strongly recommend him because his lectures are funny, engaging, relevant, and make political science easier to understand.

Both formats are highly positive, with the strongest volume of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are manageable with notes and assignments, but several reviews call him a tough or .

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on success through attendance and notes.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload is usually light to moderate, with , and exams rather than constant busywork.

Format shift

and , while online reviews emphasize lectures, notes, video quizzes, and exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Reviews consistently call him engaging, hilarious, passionate, relevant, and one of the .

Format shift

Both formats strongly praise teaching, with in-person reviews providing broader and more detailed support.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades combine readings, news analyses, , and final rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions video quizzes and exams, while in-person evidence , and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive, with students praising his humor, lectures, relevance, and .

Main concern

Some students warn that he talks fast and can grade strictly.

What students said

“He makes the lecture super conversational & engaging.”
POL101
“He talks extremely fast so be ready.”
POL101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and say lectures are engaging, recorded, and manageable if students attend and .

Main concern

Students must attend or review lectures and .

What students said

“he does record his lectures so you can go back and review”
POL101
“You MUST go to class. .”
POL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because multiple reviews mention open notes or .

Open NotesMidterm And Final On CanvasVideo QuizzesEasy If Notes Are Strong

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, Canvas exams, and exams that are easy with good notes.

Open NotesMidterm And Final On CanvasEasy With Notes
“The final and .”
POL101
“the .”
POL101

Online

Online reviews mention video quizzes and two exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Video QuizzesTwo ExamsDetailed Notes Needed
“ and 2 exams.”
POL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He makes the lecture super conversational & engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ !”

📈 Grade Strategy

80/100

“ , and you'll succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • he knows how to keep the students engaged and laughing.
  • His lectures are relevant to what is going on in the present.
  • Long lectures went by quick.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • but does give critical reading assignments, 4 total.
  • All the work was and the .
  • and you should be fine.

Theme 3

📝

  • pay attention and attend class and you will be fine
  • You MUST go to class. .
  • All you and pay attention.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 17 recent and older reviews are detailed, mostly consistent, and include both online and in-person perspectives.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POL10115 reviews
POL2802 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3