AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Gardner

ENGL228 · ENG227 · ENGLISH52 · ENGL52 · ENG52 · ENG225 · ENGL225 · ENGL72 · ENG103H · ENG100 · ENG103 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if you want to become a better writer and , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful Writing CoachTough GraderReading HeavyEssay FocusedCaring But Demanding
  • Gardner is widely praised as caring, helpful, and strong at improving students' writing.
  • The course , and close attention to instructions.
  • Grades are fair but not easy because many students call him a tough or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

An A is possible if you follow instructions, revise carefully, read consistently, and , but it is not a low-effort grade.

Online reviews show both easy discussion-based sections and strict grading, while , and sustained effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is usually straightforward English work, but the volume of , and detailed expectations raises the challenge.

Online courses can feel straightforward, while because of daily reading, papers, and class-based preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

preparation, and understanding expectations, though some leniency is mentioned.

Online evidence centers on deadlines and participation, while or is necessary.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and growth, but students seeking an easy English class often hesitate.

Both formats praise his help, but online reviews include and time pressure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

and sometimes called tough, but many students say and useful feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews mention strict AI rules and detail-sensitive grading, while but fair when instructions are followed.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload is heavy because many sections include , and exams.

Format shift

Online workload varies from discussion-heavy to tight-deadline essay work, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe him as , and effective at improving writing, despite some complaints about clarity and pace.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both praise his support, with and classroom guidance.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment , and writing projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, essays, quizzes, and a final, while , and final papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a caring, effective writing professor , and sustained effort.

Main concern

The main issue is workload, with , and .

What students said

“he will make you write so much”
ENG100
“ but he tells you what you can improve on.”
ENG103H
“You must work to get a good grade in this class!”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean positive, with helpful feedback and and limited .

Main concern

Online students warn that small details, tight deadlines, and .

What students said

“He is very strict on AI and is a .”
ENG103H
“Probably the online English course.”
ENGL228
“ and gives really short .”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

essay exams and quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Essay-Based MidtermEssay-Based FinalReading QuizzesFinal On Logical FallaciesWritten Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and in-class written essay exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Written QuizzesMidterm PaperFinal PaperIn-Class Essay Exams
“the midterm and the readings.”
ENG225
“There is papers you have to write and a as well as .”
ENG100
“Grade is based on 4 big essays, about 6 mini-essays, 2 tests, and .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Easy Online Final In One CourseQuizzes And ExamsLogical Fallacies Final
“Probably the online English course.”
ENGL228
“the of nowhere.”
ENG103H
“ and ”
ENGL228

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You must work to get a good grade in this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He pushes you to do better in your writing and supports you along the way.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“If you .”

⚖️

40/100

“He is very strict on AI and is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He puts a great amount of effort and care into both his teachings and his students.
  • He is SOO AMAZING like honestly he help me so much.
  • He really likes what he does and takes the time to know you and help you.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • he will make you write so much
  • There will be 3 essays the

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • but he tells you what you can improve on.
  • Pretty much just write exactly how he teaches you and you'll get an A.
  • You must work to get a good grade in this class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 48 reviews cover many years, formats, and English courses with detailed and recurring themes.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 511
3 out of 59
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10020 reviews
ENG103H6 reviews
ENG1035 reviews
ENG2254 reviews
ENG523 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH523 reviews
ENGL2282 reviews
1001 review
ENG2271 review
ENGL2251 review
ENGL521 review
ENGL721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 3 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

17

B+ 7 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No_Grade 1