AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mojdeh Nikdel

MATH80MATH112 · MATHMATH · MATH112 · MATH170 · STATS112 · MATH80 · MATH250 · MATH70 · MATH190 · STAT112 · MATH225 · 143 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
35.42%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if , and actively use tutoring or office hours.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homework loadSelf-learning requiredTough gradingMixed helpfulnessUnclear lectures
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, but the dominant complaint is that students must teach themselves much of the material.
  • as excessive, with many reports of tough grading and .
  • Some students succeed with study guides, office hours, , and heavy effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but comments show , and tolerance for tough grading.

Online reviews include a , while in-person reviews more often describe harsh effort and grade risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is challenging and often feels harder because many students say .

Online sections can be doable with study guides, while in-person sections contain stronger complaints about and errors.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many in-person reviews warn that missing class or not following her process makes success unlikely.

Attendance pressure is mainly supported by in-person reviews, while online reviews , and exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because of , and tough grading, despite some successful students.

Online recommendations are more mixed, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students frequently call her a , though and rounding can help students who complete the work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention open-note exams and possible rounding, while and unforgiving mistakes.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

as 60 to 180 problems per week, often with quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework, but in-person Math 190 and Math 112 reviews describe the workload as especially overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

, but many say lectures are unclear, error-prone, and require self-learning.

Format shift

Online and self-learning complaints, while in-person reviews more often criticize lecture clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Grades appear to rely , and occasional .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, two exams, finals, and open-note formats, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative or cautionary, especially for Math 112 and Math 190, with repeated complaints about and .

Main concern

Students report , and cold responses to questions.

What students said

“Didn't understand anything she lectured.”
MATH190
“If you want 100+ math problems a week then go ahead.”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students appreciating study guides and open-note exams while others report self-learning and little help.

Main concern

Online students often say success depends on self-teaching and .

What students said

“Completely self learning w/ her PPTs and doing the HW.”
MATH250
“Get ready to do about 100 homework problems per week plus a quiz.”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some online exams are open-note with practice exams, while as hard or stressful.

Open-Note Online ExamsPractice ExamsStudy GuidesHard TestsOn-Campus Tests In One Online Review

Assessment risk

Varies

57/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams, and exam review days, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctored rules.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesPractice ExamsExam Review Days
“Sometimes the quizzes had problems that werent related to the ”
MATH112
“ but they're pretty fair and and homework.”
MATH170

Online

Online evidence explicitly supports open-note, time-window exams in one Math 250 review and on-campus tests in one older review, but .

Open-Note Exams24 Hour Quizzes48 Hour ExamsPractice ExamsOn-Campus Tests In One Review
“2 exams and a and open for 24hrs(48 hrs for exams).”
MATH250
“There is online hw and quizzes and .”
MATH112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your good at teaching yourself then you'll do fine in this class, but since the content is hard and I needed someone to teach me I struggled a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“Assigned more than 180 problems of HW and expected it to be due in 1-2 weeks”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“If you can't teach yourself the !”

⚖️

32/100

“ if you dont show every single step of work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All subject matter is taught to the class via powerpoint
  • She makes multiple
  • She is willing to help you understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was tough!
  • You work for what you deserve in her class.
  • I received an A in this class but i know that maybe 5 As were earned may failed and or got C's.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to do about 100 homework problems per week plus a quiz.
  • There are some weeks where it is ok, but some weeks you have to do around 100 textbook questions.
  • homework requiring more than 20 hours per week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

143

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and formats give detailed, consistent evidence of heavy workload and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 525
3 out of 514
2 out of 523
1 out of 530

Course coverage

MATH11230 reviews
1904 reviews
MATH2504 reviews
MATH1902 reviews
MATH2252 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1701 review
MATH1701 review
MATH701 review
MATH801 review
MATH80MATH1121 review
MATHMATH1 review
STAT1121 review
STATS1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 13

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 2