AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diane Ford

MATH40 · MATH112 · MATH80 · MATH20 · MATH23721 · MATH70 · MATH60 · LLLLLUUUU · MATH140 · MATH80B · MATH75 · MATH80A · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you value grading support and can handle inconsistent explanations, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentExtra creditConfusing lecturesEasy gradingNotes on tests
  • Students strongly disagree on teaching quality, with and .
  • Grades can be very manageable because of , and lenient homework policies.
  • She is riskier for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very possible because she often gives , and easy homework policies, but confusing lectures can raise the real effort.

Both formats mention flexibility, but in-person reviews provide much stronger evidence of , and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The grading setup is easy, but the math itself can feel .

Online comments are mixed but limited, while and confusing explanations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance matters in some classes, but reviews do not show a .

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and grade flexibility, but many warn against her because lectures can be confusing.

Online reviews are mostly positive with one serious warning, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and uncollected homework make grading forgiving despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

detail in in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Some students report , while others mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

, while in-person workload varies widely by course and year.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but repeated comments about mistakes, tangents, and skipped steps reduce the teaching score.

Format shift

Online reviews lean more positive except one poor review, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews frequently mention quizzes, exams, tests, dropped exams, and cheat sheets, with .

Format shift

In-person reviews give most assessment details, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

grading and repeated complaints about confusing, mistake-filled lectures.

Main concern

The , and disorganization.

What students said

“she breaks down the material very good and makes sure that you understand what you are doing exactly!”
MATH112
“ . She skips steps makes a ton of mistakes.”
MATH140
“This teacher is the EASIEST teacher I've ever had!!!”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive about organization, helpfulness, and flexibility, but and requires self-teaching.

Main concern

One online and students may need YouTube for help.

What students said

“ and , and helpful.”
MATH140
“If you're not good at math and at working alone and using youtube for help she's not the teacher to go to”
MATH75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because many comments mention , and dropped exams, but reviews do not prove proctoring rules.

Cheat SheetsNotes AllowedGroup QuizzesDropped Lowest ExamExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention , and dropped exams.

Cheat SheetsNotes AllowedGroup QuizzesDropped Lowest Exam
“The and she allows notes. :)”
MATH112
“ because she gets the problems straight from the homeworks.”
MATH80A
“She also Allows having cheat sheet on an exam!”
MATH140

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She skips steps makes a ton of mistakes. And then doesnt go back and fix them causing a huge amount of confusion among herself and the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“makes a lot of mistakes during lectures and is , especially when she gets distracted and speaks about her personal life instead of coursework”

📈 Grade Support

82/100

“The and she allows notes. :)”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“If you struggle with math and want genuine help and and overall good .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she tends to confuse herself and than confuse students.
  • she breaks down the material very good and makes sure that you understand what you are doing exactly!
  • Confuses herself during her own lecture Skips steps and expects you to be able to follow

Theme 2

📈

  • she allows a cheat sheet for exams and on.
  • Gives lots of ,& for every hour of tutoring.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • she cares for her students, willing to help any time of day.
  • She really cares and is so sweet.
  • Gives lots of late passes and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 37 reviews over many years with detailed but polarized evidence, so trends are credible even though experiences vary.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1407 reviews
MATH1126 reviews
MATH604 reviews
MATH804 reviews
MATH403 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH703 reviews
MATH753 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH80A2 reviews
LLLLLUUUU1 review
MATH237211 review
MATH80B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2