AI Rate Professor

English

Micheal Arambula

ENG100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can follow detailed writing instructions closely and are comfortable with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderEssay rubrics matterMixed teaching reviewsLecture heavyFeedback available
  • Student experiences are and and discouraging.
  • Grades , and minor assignment details.
  • In person reviews are more polarized, while the single online review describes a manageable but meticulous class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible for disciplined students who follow rubrics closely, but and low grades.

Online evidence says meticulous work is enough, while In person evidence is sharply mixed and often harsher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material itself is not always difficult, but strict writing expectations and detailed prompts raise the practical challenge.

The Online review calls the material manageable, while In person reviews vary from easy A to very difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One review links an easy A to showing up every day, but there .

Attendance evidence comes from In person reviews, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and structure, but and lecture issues create real risk.

The single Online review is positive, while In person reviews are split between strong praise and strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many reviews call him a , and several students report harsh or .

Format shift

Both Online and In person evidence point to strict grading, with In person complaints much stronger.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is mainly essays, rubrics, proofreading, discussions, peer reviews, and .

Format shift

Online work is described as meticulous, while In and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and support, while others report , fast speaking, and discouraging grading.

Format shift

, but In person teaching experiences are highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are divided between students who value his feedback and , and scores difficult.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and unclear, making good scores feel impossible”
ENG100
“Overall, this class is an easy A if you show up everyday and do your part in .”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review says the material is not hard, but strong grades require careful attention to every instruction.

Main concern

.

What students said

“The class and material aren't difficult, but they require being meticulous.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and assignment rubrics, and they do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews focus on essays, lectures, rubrics, and minor assignments, but do .

Essay RubricsMinor AssignmentsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ and unclear”
ENG100
“ as discussion posts and peer reviews do make a difference in your grade as well.”
ENG100

Online

The Online review discusses essay prompts and assignment instructions but does .

Essay PromptsAssignment InstructionsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ and instructions on other assignments”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you cannot alter your entire writing style to fit his perfect .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assignment structure. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

20/100

“ and unclear, making good scores feel impossible”

🎯 Teaching Experience

58/100

“He understands when one is struggling, as long as you reach out when you need help, he will guide you in the right direction.”

📈 Effort For Grade

42/100

“Overall, this class is an easy A if you show up everyday and do your part in .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • He nitpicks minor errors instead of helping us improve as writers.
  • Arambula is a his perfect guidelines.
  • To get good and instructions on other assignments

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teacher does most of the talking and rarely allows students to participate or engage with peers.
  • He speaks a little to fast for my comfort during lectures so I had to pay close attention
  • There really isn't any negative things that I can think about concerning the way that the professor teaches the class.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • as discussion posts and peer reviews do make a difference in your grade as well.
  • through the essay rubrics thoroughly.
  • it all adds up. Always proofread!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews include detailed evidence across formats, but opinions are polarized and some recommendation data is missing.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1007 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values