AI Rate Professor

Business

Jorge Vergara

BA113 · BA100 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an upbeat professor with strong student approval and a low risk of failing.

Best fit · Easy A HunterMotivatingAmazing LecturesExtra CreditInspirationalHard to Fail
  • Students consistently describe him as motivating and engaging.
  • and forgiving outcomes make passing feel very easy.
  • Evidence is positive but brief, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Students mention and say the class is impossible to fail, even though reported grades are Bs rather than As.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course seems manageable and approachable, but the difficulty ratings around 3 suggest it is not completely effortless.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and comments are strongly positive.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

and impossible-to-fail comments point to very forgiving grading despite limited grade data.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

The comments suggest low stress, but they do not give enough detail to prove a featherlight workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the course experience.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students repeatedly call him motivating, inspirational, and strong in lectures.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention and a pop quiz tag, but do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

The limited .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and strongly praise his motivation, lectures, and forgiving course experience.

Main concern

The reviews are very short, so and .

What students said

“Very good professor! Very motivating”
BA100
“Super cool impossible to fail”
BA113

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or rules.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super cool impossible to fail”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Very good professor! Very motivating”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Wondering professor !”

📈 Grade Risk

93/100

“Super cool impossible to fail”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wondering professor !
  • Very good professor! Very motivating

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super cool impossible to fail

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent but very short reviews are consistent and positive, though they provide limited detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BA1002 reviews
BA1131 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values