AI Rate Professor

Theater

Susan Watanabe

TH21846 · TH101 · THEAT101 · THTH · TH123 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and can handle tough grading and inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDisorganizedExtra CreditPassionate in CostumingPolarizing Teaching
  • Students strongly disagree on her value, with makeup and costuming students much more positive than some TH101 students.
  • as tough, but and late-work flexibility appear in several reviews.
  • Many negative reviews cite weak lectures, disorganization, videos, and poor classroom control.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

can help, but many students say and an A may require strong work and persistence.

Online reviews make the A path sound easier, while and higher standards.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content can be manageable, but hands-on projects, tests, and many students.

Online TH101 sounds simple aside from the midterm, while in-person sections vary from easy and project work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but one review says she does not mind lateness and the comments do not prove a single strict policy.

Attendance evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, but many others warn against her because of disorganization and weak teaching.

Online reviews are more favorable, while in-person reviews are sharply divided and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students repeatedly call her a , though and late work reduce the harshness somewhat.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and easier passing, while in-person reviews more often emphasize strict standards and low scores.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Online work is described as light, but , and makeup work can add real effort.

Format shift

Online workload appears lighter, while and project demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews praise her caring and craft knowledge, but , and disorganization lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly satisfied, while delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and a final depending on course format.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and a midterm, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for caring craft instruction but many , and weak lectures.

Main concern

and inconsistent teaching quality.

What students said

“She is a and pushes you to improve.”
TH123
“She literary just reads of pp slides and shows youtube videos.”
TH101
“ and interesting and if .”
TH123

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online TH101 reviews are generally positive, with simple weekly work and but a .

Main concern

The the online course.

What students said

“There isn't too much work each week and she offers a ton of .”
TH101
“All you needed to do to pass , and the book- very easy!”
THEAT101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests and midterms, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Difficult MidtermTest Heavy in Some SectionsFinal-Day Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and multiple tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Test HeavyFinal-Day Tests
“ .”
TH101
“ ”
TH101

Online

Online reviews mention a difficult midterm but do .

Difficult Midterm
“The mid-term was difficult”
TH101
“But the ; lots of questions on random things”
THEAT101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a and pushes you to improve.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Did not spend time teaching during class, just had us watch the videos ourselves.”

⚖️

32/100

“She is a and pushes you to improve.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“If taught by Susan.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She literary just reads of pp slides and shows youtube videos.
  • She is interesting, and funny, and if you do the work, you will do okay.
  • Did not spend time teaching during class, just had us watch the videos ourselves.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Had the yet got zeros.
  • She is a and pushes you to improve.
  • There isn't too much work each week and she offers a ton of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Susan is an awesome professor and an amazing person!
  • Susan is a gracious and magnanimous teacher.
  • , but really doesn't have time to bother with those who don't catch on immediately.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years give broad evidence, though course differences make the professor profile mixed.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

TH10110 reviews
TH1235 reviews
THEAT1012 reviews
TH218461 review
THTH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1