AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yarmoli Murugiah

MATH155 · MATH60 · MATH80 · MATH112 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless and tolerate heavy math workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHeavy WorkloadTest HeavyStrict AttendanceLow Recommendation
  • Most students report , and difficulty understanding lectures.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as heavy, with , and tests.
  • A small minority had positive outcomes, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students who , and the need to self-teach.

Both formats are negative, with effort and poor grade security.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content becomes much harder because students report , and little useful help.

The , while in-person reviews repeatedly describe fast, confusing, lecture-heavy classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Several in-person reviews mention attendance pressure, including attendance being taken at the end and skip-class warnings.

, while the online review does not clearly address it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students strongly discourage taking her because they found the , and the class stressful.

The single online review and few older in-person exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students cite tough grading, , and frequent quizzes.

Format shift

, while the online review only supports a hard class generally.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and tests.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say she is hard , and reacts badly when students struggle.

Format shift

The online review is also very negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews frequently describe the class as test heavy, quiz heavy, and lecture heavy, with homework as constant support work.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about , and classroom tone.

Main concern

Students often say they had to teach themselves to pass.

What students said

“On my first day, I knew I was going to have to .”
MATH112
“Save yourself the headache and .”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says she explained poorly, seemed unprepared, and .

Main concern

The online student felt the professor was learning with the class instead of teaching it.

What students said

“She is learning with us, not teaching us.”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly mention tests and pop quizzes, but reviews .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesStudy GuidesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH112
“Very test and lecture heavy”
MATH155

Online

The online review says the course is test heavy but does not clearly prove .

Test Heavy
“ .”
MATH112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself the headache and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She does not teach well and its hard to understand her.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“She will flood you with packet and online work piled up ALL THE TIME.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just writes on the board and expects you to know.
  • and expected you to already know it.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Tests

  • Very test and lecture heavy
  • She gives a .
  • Everything is on mylab

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Dropping that class was the greatest thing ever.
  • The whole time she kept blaming the class.
  • Dont get this teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews over multiple years show a strong, consistent negative pattern with detailed comments and only a few positive exceptions.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH11211 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH1552 reviews
MATH602 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

6

B 3 · B- 3

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 5