AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Tisha Pison

N212 · ADN230 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a , but expect her energetic style may not fit every student.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive Clinical CoachGives Good FeedbackCaring MentorConfidence BuilderMostly Student Friendly
  • Most students describe her as caring, supportive, and .
  • Grades reported are strong, but one review warns that her teaching style can feel unclear or poorly suited to clinical calm.
  • All evidence is from in-person nursing clinical reviews, with no online data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reported grades are mostly A or A+, and positive reviews suggest students can do well when engaged in clinical work.

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The clinical content is not described as intellectually easy, but students.

, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend her because , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

High reported grades and , though detailed grading rules are not discussed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Reviews focus on clinical support rather than workload, so the workload appears manageable but not clearly light.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists, and it is limited.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe her as caring, supportive, motivating, and helpful in clinical learning.

Format shift

serious concern about clarity and clinical demeanor.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews describe clinical skills and feedback but .

Format shift

assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly , and confidence-building in clinical settings.

Main concern

One student found and not calm enough.

What students said

“She is amazing and always made me feel supported through the semester.”
ADN230
“ and .”
N212
“ in areas where students need clearer guidance.”
N212

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is amazing and always made me feel supported through the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and .”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“You can tell she cares and not just because its a job.”

⚠️ Clarity Concern

58/100

“ in areas where students need clearer guidance.”

Theme 1

👩‍⚕️ About Clinical Support

  • She allows students to grow in their independence and confidence by trusting us when passings meds or doing skills.
  • She makes you feel comfortable in patient rooms and gives words of motivation to her students.

Theme 2

💬

  • She is amazing and always made me feel supported through the semester.
  • and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • Her teaching style can sometimes overshadow the clarity of the material presented.
  • if possible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because there are only four reviews, but they include recent, specific clinical comments with a mostly consistent positive pattern.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N2123 reviews
ADN2301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1