AI Rate Professor

Speech Communication

April Bracamontes

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider Bracamontes only if and speech-topic structure.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy gradingGroup speechesBiased sourcesExtra creditLow credibility evidence
  • The and includes .
  • The main concern is course content quality, especially non-credible and biased speech sources.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The only review , and there are opportunities.

Evidence , so online easy-A evidence does not exist.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The work sounds manageable, but group speeches and source-based argument tasks add moderate structure and pressure.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it describes the class as manageable but not content-free.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

The review mentions participation and group speeches but does not clearly prove a .

Only one in-person review mentions participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The low rating and source-quality complaint make the course hard .

Recommendation evidence comes .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

The review directly says grading , and exists.

Format shift

reviews available.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The course includes speeches, group work, a few quizzes, and , but the review does not call the workload heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison can be made.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The professor is described as nice, but the review criticizes biased and non-credible source use in speech topics.

Format shift

, and there is no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears centered on assignments, group speeches, one-on-one grading, a few quizzes, and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists and and assignments than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single in-person review describes easy grading, group speeches, a few quizzes, and concerns about biased sources.

Main concern

The review criticizes the credibility and bias of sources used for speech topics.

What students said

“grading is easy all assignments are 5 points.”
130-31033
“Uses non credible and bias sources during her speech topics”
130-31033

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a few quizzes but do not clearly prove the policy.

Few QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person evidence only mentions a few quizzes and does .

Few QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“a ”
130-31033

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“grading is easy all assignments are 5 points.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting available themes in , and course-content concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

80/100

“grading is easy all assignments are 5 points.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Uses non credible and bias sources during her speech topics”

📝 Assessment Style

30/100

“All speeches are done in groups of 4/5”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • grading is easy all assignments are 5 points.
  • 2 opportunities.

Theme 2

🗣️ About Speeches

  • All speeches are done in groups of 4/5
  • she grades 1-on-1 once for a grade of 10 points.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Content

  • Uses non credible and bias sources during her speech topics
  • then makes you pick a side and make a speech supporting it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, one course, and and exams.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

130-310331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values