AI Rate Professor

Economics

Stacey Smith

ECON202 · ECON201M · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you value structure and support, but expect real studying and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear structureTest heavyHeavy materialOpen-book exams
  • Students generally view Smith as caring, fair, and .
  • Online sections look more manageable, while and lots of work.
  • , and students say them.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

Even with some fairness and online open-book exams, students report , and grades mostly below A.

Online evidence is more forgiving, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Economics content is described as heavy and exam-focused, and .

Online sections can feel easier, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Students recommend her for fairness and support, but difficulty and .

Online reviews are more recommendable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She is described as fair and offers , but and mostly B-range grades limit leniency.

Format shift

Online grading sounds fairer, while because of .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention , and a need to study beyond homework.

Format shift

Online workload is manageable for some, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe her as , and trying to make class engaging.

Format shift

Both formats support positive teaching, though online lectures may rely on Khan Academy.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments repeatedly emphasize exams, tests, study guides, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention exam importance, with online reviews giving the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but describe the class as hard, work-heavy, and test-heavy.

Main concern

Heavy material and test mismatch can make the class difficult.

What students said

“Lots of work that needs to be done and very heavy material.”
ECON201M
“The study guides are nothing like the .”
ECON201M
“Great teacher, cares for her students, tries to make the class fun.”
ECON202

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a fair and , and one serious concern about exam anti-cheating focus.

Main concern

because cheating prevention is a major focus.

What students said

“Prof.Smith has good intentions, structures the class well & responds quick.”
ECON202
“ so .”
ECON201M
“took this online, was an easy class with weekly assignments.”
ECON201M

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be open-book, but and difficult test alignment make the exam experience only moderately student-friendly.

Open Book ExamsProctored DeviceMultiple Choice And Written ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as difficult and misaligned with study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyStudy Guide Mismatch
“The study guides are nothing like the .”
ECON201M
“Be ready to study because it is a hard class.”
ECON201M

Online

device, with multiple-choice and written parts, and reviews do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Open Book ExamsProctored DeviceMultiple Choice And Written Exams
“ as long as its on same proctored device.”
ECON202
“2 parts to each exam: Multiple Choice+Written.”
ECON202
“ so .”
ECON201M

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof.Smith has good intentions, structures the class well & responds quick.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Prof.Smith has good intentions, structures the class well & responds quick.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Lots of work that needs to be done and very heavy material.”

📝

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof.Smith has good intentions, structures the class well & responds quick.
  • Shes fair and is willing to work with you to help you out.
  • Great teacher, cares for her students, tries to make the class fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of work that needs to be done and very heavy material.
  • Be ready to study because it is a hard class.
  • took this online, was an easy class with weekly assignments.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • A big part of the class feels focused on preventing cheating during exams, & homework alone isn't enough to succeed.
  • as long as its on same proctored device.
  • The study guides are nothing like the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and but mixed difficulty and recommendation signals.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON201M3 reviews
ECON2022 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values