AI Rate Professor

Law

Laura Tchulluian

LAW160 · LAW105 · LAW113 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid Tchulluian unless you are highly self-driven and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict gradingSelf-taught feelTest heavyLecture heavyPoor guidance
  • Students consistently , and a self-taught course experience.
  • Grades are hard to secure because , and .
  • The only online review matches the same pattern: knowledgeable professor, but little guidance and high self-direction required.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible but not easy because reviews , and little leniency.

Both online and reviews adding no curve and exam concerns.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material may be manageable for some, but the course feels harder because and .

Online evidence stresses self-teaching, while , and weak lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and group activities appear in some in-person comments.

Online reviews do not mention attendance, while activities and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because they describe poor , and .

Both formats are negative, with online evidence focused on self-teaching and and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reviews explicitly describe strict , and .

Format shift

Both online and giving the strongest no-curve evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload feels heavy because students report extensive textbook reading, lengthy assignments, and .

Format shift

Online workload is reading-heavy, while and test-heavy pressure.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly describe the teaching as , and heavily dependent on self-teaching.

Format shift

Both formats criticize guidance, though the single online review still calls her knowledgeable.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessments appear exam-heavy, with and material not fully covered in lectures.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions strict grading but not a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, boring or limited lectures, tough exams, no curve, and lengthy assignments.

Main concern

Students report , and little useful instruction.

What students said

“ grading and doesn't teach most of the material that is on the exam.”
LAW113
“She does NOT curve regardless of how poorly the class performs.”
LAW160

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says she is knowledgeable but tough, strict, and mostly expects students to read and figure things out.

Main concern

Online students may get little guidance and need Zoom meetings for one-on-one help.

What students said

“Her teaching style feels like “read the book and figure it out,” so you must stay on top of everything.”
LAW160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam style sounds strict because students report , and questions from broad textbook material.

Tough ExamsTest HeavyNo CurveQuestions From Extra Chapters

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tough, test-heavy exams, broad textbook questions, and no curve, but .

Tough ExamsTest HeavyNo CurveQuestions From Extra Chapters
“The .”
LAW160
“She does NOT curve regardless of how poorly the class performs.”
LAW160

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not waste your time or energy by taking this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“In my opinion, the class felt self taught.”

⚖️

12/100

“She does NOT curve regardless of how poorly the class performs.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She assigned and would then provide at most a 10-15 minute lecture, sometimes even shorter.
  • Her lectures are so boring! Id .
  • grading and doesn't teach most of the material that is on the exam.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • The .
  • She does NOT curve regardless of how poorly the class performs.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • Good for self-driven students, but not ideal if you want guidance or an easy class.
  • There are better class options than this.
  • if you know you dont like boring professors

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are enough to show a consistent negative pattern, but the sample is small and includes only one online review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

LAW1603 reviews
LAW1052 reviews
LAW1132 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values