AI Rate Professor

English

Lesley Blake

20401ENG · ENGL52 · ENG52 · ENG · ENG100 · ENG103 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
47.37%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Blake only if you can handle frequent writing and and late-work flexibility.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy essaysTough gradingDelayed gradingCaring when engagedLate-work flexibility
  • Workload and reading.
  • as harsh or delayed.
  • Positive , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and grades based on a few major papers.

Online evidence includes some late-work leniency, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not described as deeply advanced, but the , and .

Online and and reading load, with online short-term classes feeling more compressed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though some reviews suggest participation matters and one says showing up alone is not enough.

, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

and patience, but many warn against the , and delays.

Online reviews are slightly more forgiving because of late-work flexibility, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often describe tough or , and several say small writing mistakes can seriously affect the .

Format shift

Both formats mention strict grading, but .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly cite lots of , and condensed online workloads.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize stacked Canvas work, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and complaints about unclear guidance and slow grading.

Format shift

Online reviews praise feedback in some cases, while and harsh experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and a few major writing tasks rather than exams.

Format shift

and assignments as the core assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews range from very supportive to very negative, with , and .

Main concern

In-person students report unclear guidance and .

What students said

“ , but there was limited guidance or examples provided.”
ENG100
“ and the way she does things is very harsh would not recommend”
ENG
“she made it very comfortable for me.”
ENG

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with and but some praise for feedback and due-date leniency.

Main concern

Online students most often complain about heavy workload and .

What students said

“too much work stacked on top of another.”
ENG100
“Grades heavily on each assignment which can drag you down a lot.”
ENG100
“ and was lenient on due dates.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but several suggest grades rely heavily on papers with .

Essay-Based GradingReading QuizzesFinal Test Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Reading QuizzesFinal Test MentionedEssay-Based Grading
“As long as you pass the .”
ENG52
“she gives easy quizzes on what she taught at the end of class.”
ENG

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Essay-Based Grading
“So your grade is based on how good .”
ENG52

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms.Blake's 9-week online class was a bit challenging due to the condensed workload, but it was completely bearable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She goes over the and .”

⚖️

28/100

“Grades heavily on each assignment which can drag you down a lot.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“She gives so and it's only for 7% of your grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very patience and helpful!
  • She goes over the and .
  • She meets with each student one on one to make sure they understand the work and to answer any questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and the way she does things is very harsh would not recommend
  • Grades heavily on each assignment which can drag you down a lot.
  • So your grade is based on how good .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • too much work stacked on top of another.
  • Lots of homework
  • Our semester ends next Thursday and she has give us 6 homework assignments while we still have to finish our 2,500 word essay.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews span many years and , and feedback.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENG10010 reviews
ENG524 reviews
ENG1033 reviews
ENG2 reviews
20401ENG1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2