AI Rate Professor

History

Leon Waszak

HIST102 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless and learn with minimal guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyPaper heavyUnclear assignmentsOld schoolExtra credit
  • Most recent , and poor Canvas or email support.
  • One in-person student found the class easy with , and .
  • Online evidence says and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with and review support, but and weak guidance make the effort unpredictable.

and several unclear-assignment complaints, while online evidence says papers determine the grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The history content may not be conceptually hard, but and slow, unfocused lectures make the class harder to navigate.

In-person reviews stress unclear lectures and assignments, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , though in-person comments describe class review sessions and handwritten work expectations.

Neither format clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students do not recommend him because they , and poor communication.

exception, while the single online review is mixed but warns about limited help.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

and an Easy A review suggest some grade support, but papers and .

Format shift

and , while online evidence says papers control the grade.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some students report little homework, but and long videos keep the workload from feeling light.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions papers and long videos, while in-person .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most reviews describe unclear instruction, weak assignment help, slow lectures, and poor communication despite one positive review.

Format shift

In-person comments are mostly negative with one strong positive outlier, while the online review gives a mixed but limited view.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades , and written assignments rather than exam-heavy testing.

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly says papers determine the grade, while , and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, slow lectures, and paper assignments, though one student calls it an Easy A.

Main concern

Students may not get clear guidance for .

What students said

“ and he never elaborates on requirements if you ask.”
HIST102
“I did not learn anything in his class.”
HIST102
“Easy A”
HIST102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and requires long videos.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Your grade will be determined by the .”
HIST102
“he gives little to no help for assignments.”
HIST102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book exams.

QuizzesMidtermFinalPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

QuizzesMidtermFinalIn-Class Review
“ and Mid-term and .”
HIST102
“ ”
HIST102

Online

The online review focuses on papers and videos and does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

PapersExtra Credit Videos
“Your grade will be determined by the .”
HIST102
“you have to watch 3-5 hour videos”
HIST102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and he never elaborates on requirements if you ask.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, assignments, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I did not learn anything in his class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ !”

📝 Assignment Clarity

30/100

“he gives little to no help for assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's the .
  • Professor Waszak is great!
  • He is a nice professor and very understanding, but is very old school

Theme 2

📝

  • Your grade will be determined by the .
  • and he never elaborates on requirements if you ask.
  • when he assigns his essay's, I did not even know what to write

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • No book required, and did offer .
  • Easy A
  • do the it will help your grade!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews give consistent concerns, but the small sample and one strong positive outlier limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST1025 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1