AI Rate Professor

English

Amanda Reyes

ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENG200 · COS126 · ENG100 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
27.78%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless and writing and can handle strict grading and uneven communication.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingMany papersDisorganized feedbackPolarizing teacher
  • Most students describe her as a and writing demands.
  • Several students and revision chances if you work hard.
  • The overall recommendation is low because many reviews criticize her attitude, clarity, and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible through revisions and steady work, but students repeatedly say the and the workload is heavy.

Online evidence is harsher, while who work hard.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course is writing-heavy, reading-heavy, and demanding because and revisions.

Online reviews stress unclear organization, while and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and participation is mentioned as important.

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and poor organization.

Online reviews are fully negative, and in-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students call her a , and one online review says missed requirements receive a zero with no partial credit.

Format shift

Both online and sounding especially harsh.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report many readings, papers, projects, reflections, journals, and videos despite some comments saying there .

Format shift

Online reviews mention many videos and presentations, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students praise her feedback and learning value, but many describe her as .

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are very negative, while and a few positive experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays, projects, journals, reflections, readings, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based grading, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative but more mixed, with , and learning gains.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ and in class.”
ENGLISH103
“The class consists of a total of 3 projects, about 10 papers, and lots of readings.”
ENGL100
“Great professor. Make sure you do all of the assignments”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unclear , and too many videos or presentations.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She was rude and so ”
ENG100
“if you didn't meet them she just gives a 0, not even partial credit.”
ENG100
“There are too many videos and PowerPoint presentations”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe projects and papers, and one review says there are no tests or quizzes, but .

No Tests Or Quizzes Mentioned In One ReviewProject-Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says the class has no tests or quizzes and uses major projects, but reviews .

No Tests Or QuizzesThree Major ProjectsPapers And Readings
“ and ”
ENGLISH103
“ so EXTRA.”
ENGLISH103
“The class consists of a total of 3 projects, about 10 papers, and lots of readings.”
ENGL100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, webcam, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you love english and reading.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and in class.”

⚖️

20/100

“if you didn't meet them she just gives a 0, not even partial credit.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Had to put in way more hours of classes.”

Theme 1

📝 About Writing Load

  • The class consists of a total of 3 projects, about 10 papers, and lots of readings.
  • You have to do a reflection on almost every unit as well.
  • so EXTRA.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Although she .
  • she grades so toughly.
  • You do really need to work for your grade by doing the assignments.

Theme 3

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is petty and badly tries to fit in with the students with sarcasm.
  • Great professor. Make sure you do all of the assignments and ask if there is some type of misunderstanding.
  • Starts off great, then slowly class becomes less productive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across online and in-person formats give detailed, consistent concerns despite some positive counterexamples.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG1008 reviews
ENGL1005 reviews
ENGL1032 reviews
COS1261 review
ENG2001 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1