AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phoebe Chung

MATH112 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

She is a work, but online reviews are a major warning sign.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful in personRude onlineExtra creditPractice examsHomework matters
  • and willingness to help.
  • Online students strongly criticize her tone, support, and pandemic flexibility.
  • Grades can be good with , and , but effort is required.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earned A-range grades with , and manageable homework.

, while online reviews are more negative despite one A and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Statistics is not effortless, but and similar practice exams make it manageable.

, while online reviews say she can be hard to understand.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews mention absence limits and skip-class warnings, so .

, while online reviews also warn that skipping class hurts success.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Recommendation is positive in person because she helps students, but online students strongly advise against taking her.

, while all online reviews are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, cheat sheets, practice exams, and many A if students keep up.

Format shift

, while online reviews include a tough-grader tag and harsher tone.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but students also describe it as manageable or easy when they stay current.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload pressure, with online reviews sounding heavier and in-person reviews more manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

57/100

In-person teaching is praised, but online teaching is repeatedly described as , and unsupportive.

Format shift

Teaching quality is strong in person and poor online.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

and exams, with practice exams, study guides, and cheat sheets supporting test preparation.

Format shift

and tests, while online evidence focuses more on exams and class experience.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a and offers practice exams, cheat sheets, and .

Main concern

Students must keep up with homework and .

What students said

“Ms. Chung breaks the material down step by step, which is very useful.”
MATH112
“Make sure to keep up with the .”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, , and webcam-related exam concerns.

Main concern

Students felt unsupported and treated harshly online.

What students said

“This teacher is terrible.”
MATH112
“the exams however she is hard to understand sometimes and VERY rude.”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

supported by practice materials and online exams including open notes but one webcam concern.

Practice ExamsSimilar Exam QuestionsOpen Note ExamsCheat SheetsWebcam Requirement

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention practice exams similar to real exams and cheat sheets, with .

Practice ExamsSimilar Exam QuestionsCheat Sheets
“We get practice exams, and the questions on the numbers.”
MATH112
“lets you use cheat sheets for the exams.”
MATH112

Online

and one webcam requirement, but do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser or closed-book testing.

Open Note ExamsWebcam Requirement
“the exams”
MATH112
“For an due to the one on our laptop doesnt show our hands and face.”
MATH112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Chung breaks the material down step by step, which is very useful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

57/100

“Ms. Chung breaks the material down step by step, which is very useful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

62/100

“ .”

📈 Easy A Path

78/100

“gave out , lets you use cheat sheets for the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Chung breaks the material down step by step, which is very useful.
  • She does have a bit of an accent, but if u ever have any questions .
  • This teacher is terrible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Make sure to keep up with the .
  • gave out , lets you use cheat sheets for the exams.
  • We get practice exams, and the questions on the numbers.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • She doesnt have office hours to get assistance
  • VERY rude.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across both formats provide consistent format-specific patterns and and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1128 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1