AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Peter Maloney

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable with and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude FeedbackHeavy ReadingStrict GradingFew Grades
  • The only review describes rude and .
  • .
  • The student withdrew and gave a low quality rating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A looks very hard because the only student withdrew after strict and .

All evidence comes from one Online review, with no In person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course seems , and accuracy demands.

All course difficulty evidence comes from one Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

No format-based attendance difference is supported by the comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only review is strongly negative because of rude comments and .

The recommendation evidence is only from Online delivery.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The student reports losing points without useful .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tags mention lots of homework and reading, so the workload appears heavy.

Format shift

Only Online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The teaching experience is poor because the only detailed and lack of support.

Format shift

Only Online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The and .

Format shift

Only Online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is , and heavy work.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“ .”
100
“ the conference even though I answered the questions stipulated.”
100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The Online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“ the conference even though I answered the questions stipulated.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“The reviews mentioned that he can be rude and challenging to be accurate.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The reviews mentioned that he can be rude and challenging to be accurate.
  • .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • the conference even though I answered the questions stipulated.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review and it covers a narrow experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1