AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Charles Osaki

ACCT100 · ACCT101 · ACT101 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you value a caring accounting professor and are ready to study hard for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring and HelpfulTest HeavyTough Timed ExamsAccounting KnowledgeMixed Clarity
  • Students often praise Osaki as , and invested in student success.
  • The main drawback is a test-heavy grading structure with .
  • Online and by serious complaints about exams and clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students must learn the material well because and can be long and difficult.

Both formats report tough exams, with online reviews especially emphasizing time pressure and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Accounting concepts are manageable with help, but difficult exams, numerical errors, and .

Online reviews stress test pressure, while and grading balance.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance and participation are strongly encouraged because lectures, questions, and help sessions matter, but .

Both formats suggest staying engaged is important, while no review clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, but several warn against the course because .

Recommendations are positive in both formats, but online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

Grades can be fair for prepared students, but and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews include both fairness praise and complaints about imbalance.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and quizzes are often manageable, but , and accounting practice require steady effort.

Format shift

Online reviews call homework easy but exams demanding, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is widely seen as , and knowledgeable, though some students find his explanations confusing or error-prone.

Format shift

Both formats contain strong praise for support, but in-person reviews .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students repeatedly describe the course as , and projects.

Format shift

Online reviews state exam weighting most clearly, while , and test-heavy grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his care and real-life examples, but some students report , and difficult tests.

Main concern

and grading feel unbalanced or unfair.

What students said

“He , but was fair”
ACCT101
“ and unbalanced.”
ACCT101
“ and dont give enough time to finish.”
ACCT101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews praise his support and engagement but repeatedly warn that , and heavily weighted.

Main concern

Online grades depend .

What students said

“70% of the grade is based on 4 exams.”
ACCT101
“ , and he doesn't give you enough time to complete the exam.”
ACCT101
“Currently doesn't use Proctorio.”
ACCT101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , difficult, time-limited exams, though online proctoring is not clearly used.

Test HeavyLong ExamsTime PressureNo Proctorio Mentioned OnlineMidterm and Final

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and midterm or final exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book policy.

Difficult ExamsTest HeavyMidterm and FinalReviews do not clearly prove closed-book policy
“He , but was fair”
ACCT101
“ and dont give enough time to finish.”
ACT101
“ and .”
ACCT100

Online

Online reviews describe long, tough, time-limited exams and one review explicitly says Proctorio is not currently used.

Test HeavyLong ExamsTime PressureNo Proctorio
“Currently doesn't use Proctorio.”
ACCT101
“ , and he doesn't give you enough time to complete the exam.”
ACCT101
“There will be 3 exams which a few questions are pretty long”
ACCT101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He , but was fair and taught with real-life scenarios that helped us better understand the reality of accounting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He genuinely cares about accounting, and I found his lectures to be rather informative.”

🧪

32/100

“ , and he doesn't give you enough time to complete the exam.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“He's definitely an accomodating teacher, so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Osaki is very helpful.
  • He breaks down the lectures really well if you just pay attention and put in some work there should be no reason you fail.
  • Prof. Osaki is very knowledgeable in accounting but does many errors as he is teaching

Theme 2

🧪

  • 70% of the grade is based on 4 exams.
  • .
  • and dont give enough time to finish.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He always checks everyone's progress and gives them a lot of motivation.
  • He's always willing to help.
  • If you need extra help, hes more than willing to meet with you even on the weekends.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed reviews split evenly between online and and consistent risks around exams.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT10112 reviews
ACCT1007 reviews
ACT1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1