AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Kwok Wong

ENGR235 · ENG110 · ENGR110 · ENGR101 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are prepared to read heavily, attend consistently, and tolerate tough assessments.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReading HeavyTough GraderTest HeavyGroup ProjectsHard to Understand
  • Students describe his classes as demanding, reading-heavy, and .
  • Recommendation is low because , and heavy exams.
  • A few students value his professionalism and engineering insight, but the course is not low effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible, but comments , and difficult quizzes or exams.

The online review sounds passable with steady effort, while and assessments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The material and assessment style feel challenging because students mention , and .

Online evidence suggests moderate difficulty, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because comments and tags warn that skipping class can lead to failure.

Both online and follow class closely.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students do not recommend him because of , and high effort demands.

The only online review is positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

a and saying grades are based on few difficult items.

Format shift

Strict grading concerns are mainly from in-person reviews; the .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy because students , and lost sleep from projects.

Format shift

Online workload sounds manageable with chapter follow-through, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students value his insight, but many complain about , and limited grade transparency.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mildly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment leans toward exams and quizzes, though ENGR110 also includes a major group project.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment evidence; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and communication issues.

Main concern

Students , and harsh assessment style.

What students said

“ are incredibly difficult and as difficult.”
ENGR235
“He's a .”
ENGR101
“Unless .”
ENGR110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is moderately positive but still says students must follow chapters closely and ask questions during class.

Main concern

, so students may need to ask questions live.

What students said

“As long as .”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and tricky test wording, while online exam rules are not clearly proven.

Difficult QuizzesHeavy ExamsWord Play Test QuestionsGroup Project

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and word-play test questions, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Difficult QuizzesHeavy ExamsWord Play Test Questions
“ are incredibly difficult and as difficult.”
ENGR235
“He likes .”
ENGR110
“ .”
ENGR110

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Its really hard to understand him because he has a thick accent.”

📚 Workload and Reading

28/100

“Be really to read the book!”

🧪

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He's a .
  • It is by no means easy
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Reading and Preparation

  • You definitely have to read the book
  • !
  • Be really to read the book!

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He basically just reads the book really slowly
  • Very fine professor!
  • The questions don't really care if you really understand the materials

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 9 reviews with consistent difficulty themes, but only one online review and a limited grade sample.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGR1105 reviews
ENGR1012 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENGR2351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values