AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Andrew Sauer

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Andrew Sauer if you want a and are willing to practice consistently.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpful outside classGood feedbackPractice-based successAccounting made easier
  • The only review is highly positive and says he cares about student progress.
  • Accounting is still difficult, but he makes it easier through practice and support.
  • Success depends on doing the assigned practice work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A seems realistic with consistent practice, but the subject itself is not effortless.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Accounting is described as difficult, even though Sauer helps students understand it better.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The student strongly recommends him because , and makes accounting easier.

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

The review reports an A and success through assignments, but it .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload centers on practice assignments that are necessary for success.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it suggests steady practice rather than heavy overload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

The , and ability to make accounting easier.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, but it is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only specific assessment evidence mentions assignments and practice work, not exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The makes difficult accounting more manageable.

Main concern

The evidence is based on only one review.

What students said

“Accounting is difficult, but he tries to make it easier for you.”
21900
“He definitely cares about your progress as a student”
21900

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Accounting is difficult, but he tries to make it easier for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in support and course difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He definitely cares about your progress as a student”

📈 Grade Effort

70/100

“as long as you do the a great time”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“If there are any ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He definitely cares about your progress as a student
  • Accounting is difficult, but he tries to make it easier for you.

Theme 2

📚 About Support

  • If there are any
  • does an online tutoring session outside of class if it is needed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive pattern is useful but not robust.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

219001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values