AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

John Madden

PHIL100HONOR · PHOL100 · PHILO100 · PHIL102 · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL102ETHICS · PHILOSOPHY100 · PHIL100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you enjoy discussion-based philosophy and can keep up with assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting discussionsOpen-minded thinkingEasy papersHard quizzesHighly recommended
  • Students consistently call him interesting, thoughtful, and .
  • The course rewards open-minded participation and timely .
  • , but papers and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A appears very realistic if students complete papers and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The concepts require an open mind and some thinking, but students describe the work as moderately easy and accessible.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but the class seems discussion-centered and benefits from active participation.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they suggest attendance is .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because he is interesting, fair, and makes philosophy feel worthwhile.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students say and gives a fair chance to earn an A if work is submitted on time.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Assignments and projects can be frequent, but students generally describe them as manageable and fair.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise his discussions, insight, and ability to make philosophy interesting and meaningful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing engaging discussions, fair chances to earn an A, and thought-provoking teaching.

Main concern

Some quizzes and , and one review says he can be dogmatic or harsh.

What students said

“He is an awesome teacher”
PHIL100
“ , but and it doesn't matter”
PHIL100HONOR
“Maden gives you a fair chance to get an A.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Hard QuizzesTests MentionedPapers Offset Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Hard QuizzesTests MentionedPapers Offset Quizzes
“ ”
PHIL100HONOR
“ ”
PHIL100HONOR

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is an awesome teacher, I did not expect to like this class so much.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“I would recomend him to anyone.”

⚖️

82/100

“Maden gives you a fair chance to get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an awesome teacher
  • Professor Madden was truly remarkable.
  • Dr. Madden's class gives real insight to many different opinions and ideas.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but and it doesn't matter
  • gives you an A if you do your work on time.

Theme 3

💬 About Discussion

  • some of the discusions in class are very interesting.
  • Open minds required
  • Very beneficial for opening your mind.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is moderately credible because 16 reviews are mostly consistent, but many are old and several contain little detail.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1005 reviews
PHIL1023 reviews
PHIL102ETHICS2 reviews
PHILOSOPHY2 reviews
PHIL100HONOR1 review
Show 3 more courses
PHILO1001 review
PHILOSOPHY1001 review
PHOL1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values