AI Rate Professor

Education

Susan Gradin

ANY · CD110CD66 · CDALL · CDEC110 · CD124 · CD110 · CD62 · CDEC112 · CD166 · CDIT152 · CDEC · CDEC67 · CD167 · CDIT · CD · CDEC164 · CDCD66 · CHILDDEVELOP · CDEC66 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a warm, engaging child development professor and can keep up with hands-on group work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringFun ClassesGroup ProjectsClear GradingHands-On Work
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, enthusiastic, and memorable.
  • Grades are usually easy when students attend, participate, and .
  • , and larger projects, especially online or practicum.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

89/100

An A is very realistic if students attend, participate, and complete the .

Online reviews mention more projects and papers, while with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly call the classes easy, fun, and clearly taught, .

Online evidence sounds more workload-heavy, while as especially easy and engaging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because students say skipping hurts success and class participation is central.

, while online reviews mention participation but not strict meeting rules.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

because , and makes child development engaging.

Both formats are positive, but the strongest recommendation evidence comes from many in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students say she is not a tough grader, gives , and .

Format shift

, while online reviews support clear criteria but include more workload.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

The class is easy, but students , and practicum planning.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize big projects and papers, while and group-based work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Reviews consistently praise her as caring, enthusiastic, funny, knowledgeable, and effective.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, with much richer in-person evidence across many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize packets, projects, reading, group work, papers, and sometimes no tests or exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention projects and papers, while , and no exams in some classes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her , and easy but active classes.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Just as long as you come to class and do the work, you will get an A.”
CD110
“There are . Just packets of the homework.”
CD110
“She genuinely cares about her students success and has many different ways of learning for different types of learners.”
CD110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive but , and .

Main concern

Large projects and .

What students said

“Lot of .”
CD166
“Shes open to giving any help needed or fixing any confusion.”
CD110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because easy with study guides and notes.

No Tests Or Quizzes In Some ClassesStudy Guide AllowedNotes Allowed On ExamsGroup TestsReviews do not clearly prove online proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and very passable exams using study guides or notes in others.

No Tests Or Quizzes In Some ClassesStudy Guide AllowedNotes Allowed On ExamsGroup Tests
“There are .”
CD110
“She allows you to use the study guide on the exams”
CD110
“allowing us to use notes on the book.”
CD110
“Lots of hands on activities and group tests.”
CD110

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is one teacher at Cerritos that I wish I had for every class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“This is one teacher at Cerritos that I wish I had for every class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“I definitely recommend taking all of the child development classes that she teaches.”

⚖️

90/100

“She's not a and just really wants you to enjoy the class.”

📚 Workload Reality

63/100

“Lot of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She genuinely cares about her students success and has many different ways of learning for different types of learners.
  • She makes each and every class interesting and you learn so much from her.
  • Perfect teacher for the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just as long as you come to class and do the work, you will get an A.
  • She's not a and just really wants you to enjoy the class.
  • .

Theme 3

🧩 About Workload & Format

  • Lot of .
  • There are . Just packets of the homework.
  • Its a lot of group assignments so

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of strong teaching with manageable work.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD11010 reviews
CDEC1643 reviews
CDEC673 reviews
CD1662 reviews
ANY1 review
Show 14 more courses
CD1 review
CD110CD661 review
CD1241 review
CD1671 review
CD621 review
CDALL1 review
CDCD661 review
CDEC1 review
CDEC1101 review
CDEC1121 review
CDEC661 review
CDIT1 review
CDIT1521 review
CHILDDEVELOP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 7 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values