AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Meredith Goldsmith

PHOTO150 · HUM108 · ART108 · ART100 · ART21839 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are ready for a humanities-style workload with lots of reading, writing, and uneven organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingMany PapersDisorganizedTough GraderMixed Teaching
  • The class often feels reading- and writing-heavy, especially for students expecting a typical art course.
  • Reviews are sharply split, with some praising her lectures and .
  • Getting a good grade appears possible, but , and effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A strong grade is possible, but students , and effort-heavy grading.

Online evidence is harsher because of frequent papers and organization complaints, while passing.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content is challenging because - and analysis-heavy humanities courses.

Online reviews emphasize writing load, while and difficulty for non-art majors.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears in several reviews, but .

Both formats mention participation, but neither clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn about heavy workload, poor organization, tough grading, or .

Online reviews are more consistently negative, while and strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several reviews call her a , though one in-person review says effort helps.

Format shift

Online reviews are stricter in tone, while .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and a research paper.

Format shift

Online workload is paper-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising lectures and others describing boring, scattered, or .

Format shift

Online reviews criticize organization and responsiveness, while lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and projects rather than clearly described major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, quizzes, and a research paper, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising informative lectures while and .

Main concern

The workload and lecture clarity vary a lot by student and course.

What students said

“the amount of ”
ART108
“Her whole entire lecture is scattered and .”
PHOTO150
“If she sees you are trying and putting in the effort she will pass you.”
HUM108

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing essays, readings, quizzes, a , and disorganization.

Main concern

Students report heavy writing and weak organization online.

What students said

“we have to submit a short and ”
ART100
“ ”
ART100
“she says she will Post things one day and does not.”
ART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a research paper, but do not clearly .

QuizzesResearch PaperExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and a research paper but do not clearly .

QuizzesResearch Paper
“ and a quizzes and a ”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the amount of ”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation patterns; credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“the amount of ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Her whole entire lecture is scattered and .”

⚖️

28/100

“ so bad and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚

  • There is normally a lot of and the humanities
  • the amount of
  • we have to submit a short and
  • Almost every other week we .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doctor Goldsmith is an amazing professor
  • Her whole entire lecture is scattered and .
  • and gives intersting ones at times.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If she sees you are trying and putting in the effort she will pass you.
  • If you do all the work in her class you should be able to earn a passing grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because nine reviews span several years, both formats, and detailed recurring themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1004 reviews
PHOTO1502 reviews
ART1081 review
ART218391 review
HUM1081 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2