AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kimberley Duff

PSYC101 · PSY241 · PSYCH261 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can keep up with reading and weekly work, but do not expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulReading heavyTough discussion gradingExtra credit availableOnline workload varies
  • Most online students describe Duff as caring, reachable, and if they keep up with readings.
  • Getting an A is inconsistent because but .
  • The workload is manageable for organized students but time consuming for students with heavy outside responsibilities.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if you keep up with readings and quizzes, but A.

Online evidence is mixed but mostly passable with steady work, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is generally introductory and book-based, but the pace and .

Online students mostly call the class easy or straightforward, while the and more quiz-focused.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online participation and assignments matter, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews emphasize participation-style work, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, though some hesitate because of and workload.

Online reviews drive the recommendation, while the and too limited to outweigh the broader pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

but and full-credit expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention tough discussion grading, while the .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and weekly tests, but organized students can complete the work.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is strong and mixed, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often describe Duff as caring, helpful, reachable, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support a helpful teaching experience, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and assignments rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, tests, assignments, and readings, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is negative and .

Main concern

and do not show what was missed.

What students said

“You only get one attempt on the and the results of the ”
PSYC101

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with students praising her help and clarity while , and .

Main concern

Discussion posts and and hard to score perfectly on.

What students said

“ and caring, the 350-word discussion boards were crazy and there was a ”
PSYC101
“shes a discussion assignments for an introduction class.”
PSYC101
“Just read the book and you will pass all the quizzes”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

quizzes and tests, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Weekly TestsTimed QuizzesOne Quiz AttemptLocked Quiz Results

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The attempt, and hide results, but it does not clearly prove proctoring or open-book status.

Timed QuizzesOne Quiz AttemptLocked Quiz Results
“You only get one attempt on the and the results of the ”
PSYC101

Online

Online reviews mention weekly tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book format.

Weekly TestsBook-Based Quizzes
“there was a ”
PSYC101
“Just read the book and you will pass all the quizzes”
PSYC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's great. . Took her 9 week course and passed with an A. Very helpful. Easy to reach whenever you have questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and caring”

⚖️

48/100

“shes a discussion assignments for an introduction class.”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“A lot of assignments and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring
  • Very helpful. Easy to reach whenever you have questions.
  • Great professor, always offering to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just read the book and you will pass all the quizzes
  • shes a discussion assignments for an introduction class.
  • Offers

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • there was a
  • A lot of assignments and .
  • Not a hard class but you cant push work off until the last minute.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years give consistent , and teaching style, though in-person evidence is only one review.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYC1017 reviews
PSY2411 review
PSYCH2611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1