AI Rate Professor

Health Occupations

Harold Robbins II

NUSG232 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can handle strict clinical criticism and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderClinical pressureCritical feedbackLecture heavyLow empathy
  • Students describe clinicals as very demanding, critical, and high-pressure.
  • There is some value in the instruction, but the tone is seen as oppressive or unsupportive.
  • Recommendation evidence is very weak, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students describe harsh clinical standards and a real risk of failing.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content and clinical expectations appear , and CPE performance.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person NUSG232 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , but clinical structure likely requires presence without enough direct evidence for a stricter label.

There is no online attendance evidence, and in-person reviews focus on .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students do not recommend the experience because as critical, oppressive, and harsh.

All recommendation evidence is in person and strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students explicitly describe tough grading and possible failure for weak clinical performance.

Format shift

, and both point toward strict evaluation.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The course requires hard work in lectures and clinicals, with demanding performance expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

, but students describe his clinical style as critical, oppressive, and not empathetic.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are negative with limited acknowledgment of useful instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears to include lecture-heavy testing and clinical performance evaluation.

Format shift

and clinical performance; there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

critical clinical evaluation and limited empathy.

Main concern

Students may feel harshly judged and at risk of failing if performance is not strong.

What students said

“Be ready to work hard or else he fails students.”
NUSG232
“Can feel oppressive at times and not empathetic towards students ”
NUSG232

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy coursework and strict clinical evaluation, but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyClinical Performance EvaluationExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict clinical performance evaluation, but not specific exam rules.

Test HeavyClinical Performance Evaluation
“ ”
NUSG232
“Lecture heavy”
NUSG232
“Test heavy”
NUSG232

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be ready to work hard or else he fails students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Can feel oppressive at times and not empathetic towards students but ”

⚖️

10/100

“Be ready to work hard or else he fails students.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“He and Tanecia at clinicals are your worse nightmares.”

Theme 1

🏥 About Clinicals

  • At clinicals, he can be very particular and critical of , and CPE.
  • He and Tanecia at clinicals are your worse nightmares.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be ready to work hard or else he fails students.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is okay in lectures.
  • Can feel oppressive at times and not empathetic towards students but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two in-person reviews across a long time span limit confidence, though .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUSG2322 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values