AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Patricia Riedel

N48T · N212 · NSG215 · N215 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you want a and rewards steady work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringKnowledgeableClear expectationsReal-world nursingMotivating
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, knowledgeable, and one of the .
  • She makes difficult nursing material clearer through detail, experience, and practical expectations.
  • Grades appear fair when students do the assigned work and meet expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades seem very reachable if students do the assigned work, but nursing expectations still require real effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Nursing content can be hard, but .

All course-easiness evidence is from in-person nursing reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters in some reviews, but .

There is no online evidence, and in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and practical.

All recommendation evidence is in person and consistently positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Students say and doing the work leads to success, suggesting .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload appears manageable when students complete assigned work, but nursing courses still require effort.

Format shift

; there is no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise her passion, , and real-world nursing insight.

Format shift

All and is strongly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention participation, assigned work, lecture, and clinical teaching but do not show a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they describe a mix of lecture, clinical, participation, and assigned work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive and emphasize , and real-world nursing relevance.

Main concern

Students still need to do the assigned work and participate.

What students said

“ so you know what your doing and why your doing it.”
N48T
“It's not a hard course just do the work assigned and you'll do great.”
NSG215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms Riedel is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, fairness, and nursing support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ so you know what your doing and why your doing it.”

👍 Recommendation Level

98/100

“Ms Riedel is the .”

⚖️

70/100

“You know what is expected, no surprises.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is passionate, knowledgeable, and cares for all of her students.
  • so you know what your doing and why your doing it.
  • She uses experience she has to keep you motivated and aware.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do your job and you will be fine.
  • Makes the hard stuff in nursing a lot easier.
  • It's not a hard course just do the work assigned and you'll do great.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is one of the .
  • Caring, and very knowledgeable.
  • Riedel's is awesome!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and spread across several years.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N48T2 reviews
N2121 review
N2151 review
NSG2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values