AI Rate Professor

Economics

Katya De Los Rios

ECONOMICS202 · ECO201M202M · ECONS201 · ECON101 · ECON202M · ECON201 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

She can work for and ask for help, but the experience is risky because teaching and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but InconsistentLecture HeavyGroup QuizzesCommunication IssuesMixed Grading
  • In-person reviews and -heavy classes.
  • and weak communication.
  • Grades can be achievable, but students report and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Several students earned A grades and say keeping up can be enough, but quizzes, projects, and A.

Online evidence is negative because technical issues hurt grades, while steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is not described as impossible, but lecture , and .

Online comments describe weak lectures and text reliance, while and hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because students say paying attention helps and skipping class can hurt passing.

Online , while in-person reviews suggest class participation and attention matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split between students who value her caring help and students who strongly advise avoiding her.

The single online review is negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students report achievable A grades, but and .

Format shift

Online grading was hurt by technical issues, while and manageable to frustrating.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work includes notes, assignments, discussions, quizzes, group work, projects, and reading.

Format shift

Online work relied heavily on text and software, while , and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students often call her caring and knowledgeable, but several describe confusing, lecture-heavy, or ineffective teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is poor, while praise and strong criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and group work rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence includes a test affected by software, while , and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising her care and and quizzes.

Main concern

, and grading consistency vary by student experience.

What students said

“Do the assignments. Pay attention. You'll get an A.”
ECO201M202M
“Not good at teaching. . Go elsewhere even if its an honor class, sure youll learn more than with her.”
ECONS201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports technical problems, poor communication, and weak lectures.

Main concern

Software issues and ignored emails can damage grades.

What students said

“she constantly has technical difficulties with the software she uses, which randomly dropped my perfect score on a .”
ECON101
“She is barely communicative, ignores emails, and seems to be avoidant at times.”
ECON101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears mixed across tests, quizzes, projects, and group work, with .

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesGroup QuizzesProjectsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequent quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesGroup QuizzesProjects
“consists of .”
ECON101
“ , and you cant study for them because she doesnt give a study guide.”
ECON201

Online

The online review mentions a test affected by software but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Software-Based Test Issue
“which randomly dropped my perfect score on a .”
ECON101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the assignments. Pay attention. You'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She was very knowledgeable and at the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Avoid if you can”

📈 Grades And Effort

63/100

“The class overall is relative easy as long you keep up with the work.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectured for almost 3 hours straight and didn't teach us anything.
  • Great teacher, get ready for notes just pay attention in class & you'll pass.
  • She was very knowledgeable and at the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the assignments. Pay attention. You'll get an A.
  • The class overall is relative easy as long you keep up with the work.
  • There is no right or wrong answers in some assignments,however,she will give you the grade she FEELS you deserve.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She is barely communicative, ignores emails, and seems to be avoidant at times.
  • Her lectures are not that great either and she relies way too much on text.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years provide useful detail, but opinions are strongly polarized and only one online review exists.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ECON2014 reviews
ECON1012 reviews
ECO201M202M1 review
ECON202M1 review
ECONOMICS2021 review
Show 1 more courses
ECONS2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values