AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Cedeno

MATH110A · MATH110 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid Jose Cedeno unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHeavy homeworkTough gradingConfusing explanationsTest heavy
  • Online reviews are strongly negative and , and .
  • Students describe lots of , and poor alignment between instruction and assessments.
  • One in-person review was positive, but the and low recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Grades require high effort because students report , and confusing grading.

Online reviews make the A look very hard, while in-person evidence is mixed but and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Students say the math content can be easy, but and poor organization make it feel much harder.

Online students especially blame the professor's structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as not mandatory, but an in-person review directly warns students to attend class.

Online evidence says Zooms are not mandatory, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because they find the , and unfairly graded.

Online recommendations are strongly negative, while one of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report tough grading, odd grading scales, point deductions for taught methods, and no .

Format shift

Online reviews are harsher about grading, while and no .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and prerecorded lectures.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially heavy, while test-heavy tags.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most , and error-prone, though one in-person student found him engaging.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly negative, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

The course , and exams rather than relying on one assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, and exams, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with one praising engagement and and .

Main concern

Clarity and .

What students said

“He made learning math fun with little fun remarks and engaging in conversations with the students.”
MATH110A
“Is extremely confusing the dont understand him.”
MATH110A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, , and tough grading.

Main concern

Students say , and lectures often do not connect clearly.

What students said

“ lectures.”
MATH110
“Honestly he is out of order with his work and it does not connect what you learn in class than what you do for homework.”
MATH110A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and exams that did not match study guides.

Proctorio QuizzesTest HeavyNo Exam ReviewsMisaligned Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, closed-book rules, or .

Test Heavy
“ATTEND class.”
MATH110A

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Proctorio quizzes, test-heavy structure, and , but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Proctorio QuizzesTest HeavyNo Exam Reviews
“ day.”
MATH110
“ ”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He's overall very unorganized, uses many excuses, does not offer office hours, students have to correct the professor's errors in his work during his lectures”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ but sadly he is the only one who teaches the subject.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“there is lots of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures.
  • He made learning math fun with little fun remarks and engaging in conversations with the students.
  • Is extremely confusing the dont understand him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • No given.
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • was useless.
  • day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews are available, but they are recent and mostly consistent about disorganization, workload, and low recommendation.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH110A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1