AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Robert Kemp

ENGR110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a manageable intro engineering class and can tolerate rambling lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterKnowledgeableEasy examsParticipation expectedRambles off topicGroup projects
  • The single review describes Kemp as knowledgeable but only an average lecturer.
  • The intro course seems easy, with easy exams and an A reported.
  • Students , and some reading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The only review reports an A and easy exams, but participation and .

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course is explicitly described as an intro class with easy exams and no need to stress.

Only the online format has evidence, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation appears expected because the review says students should expect to be called on.

Only the online review mentions participation expectations, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

The , but the tone is lukewarm because lectures are only OK and sometimes off topic.

Recommendation evidence comes only from the online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

The A grade and , though the evidence is limited to one review.

Format shift

Only the online review supports this judgment.

Workload

Light

72/100

The , and reading, but the student still frames the course as easy.

Format shift

Only the online review describes workload.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

He knows the material and has useful experience, but lectures are described as merely OK and prone to rambling.

Format shift

Only the online review describes teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears to combine , and easy exams.

Format shift

Only the online review provides assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only review is online and describes an easy intro class with , and easy exams.

Main concern

Lectures can ramble off topic and the professor may feel odd in style.

What students said

“ .”
ENGR110
“Fortunately this is an intro class, so don't sweat it.”
ENGR110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as easy, but reviews do not clearly .

Easy ExamsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review says exams are easy, but it does not clearly prove .

Easy Exams
“easy exams”
ENGR110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is OK. A bit of an odd character, but he knows his stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching style, workload, and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“He is OK. A bit of an odd character, but he knows his stuff.”

📈 Course Ease

84/100

“Fortunately this is an intro class, so don't sweat it.”

📝 Assessment Style

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is OK. A bit of an odd character, but he knows his stuff.
  • OK lectures, he has extensive experience in the engineering field that is useful, but tends to ramble off topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Fortunately this is an intro class, so don't sweat it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it contains several concrete details.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values