AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Kate John

WGS140 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable with and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingUnorganizedTextbook confusionTest heavyNot recommended
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The , and unclear textbook handling.
  • Evidence is limited to one online review, so confidence is low even though the tone is severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The only review describes strict deductions and an incomplete grade, so an A does not look easy.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content difficulty is not clearly described, but the experience appears harder because of grading and organization problems.

Only online evidence exists, and it focuses more on course management than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

The only online , and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student explicitly because of grading and disorganization.

All recommendation evidence comes from one strongly negative online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The review directly complains about point deductions for small grammar mistakes.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not clearly describe workload volume, so workload cannot be judged confidently.

Format shift

No in-person workload evidence exists, and the and organization.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The only review describes the professor as disorganized and .

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists, and it is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The review tags the course as test heavy, but provides little detail beyond that tag.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The lone online review describes harsh grading, disorganization, the wrong textbook, and a .

Main concern

The main concern is strict and .

What students said

“Her grading is ridiculous and she'll claim to not grade on "grammar" but .”
WGS-140
“ and had us all buy the wrong textbook.”
WGS-140
“Save yourself the time and .”
WGS-140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is tagged test heavy, but reviews .

Test heavyExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review supports a but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Test heavyExam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself the time and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in grading and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

10/100

“Her grading is ridiculous and she'll claim to not grade on "grammar" but .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ and had us all buy the wrong textbook.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Save yourself the time and .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Her grading is ridiculous and she'll claim to not grade on "grammar" but .

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • and had us all buy the wrong textbook.
  • I am not a fan of her at all.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Professor St. John is not the .
  • Save yourself the time and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the signal is severe but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WGS-1401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1