AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Clarence Banks

POL101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if and possible online communication gaps, but the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFriendly and approachableHelpful when engagedOnline communication issuesChapter-based examsEasy POL101
  • , but online feedback is sharply mixed.
  • Students describe POL101 as easy, with .
  • The main risk is poor online communication and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Two A grades and comments about help passing suggest an A is realistic, but reading and organization issues still require effort.

Online evidence is mixed, while the textbook reading.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students describe POL101 as easy and manageable, though .

The in-person review directly calls the class easy, while online comments focus more on support and communication.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students who had a , but the online communication complaint limits confidence.

Online recommendations are split, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades and comments suggest fair-to-lenient grading with support for students who read and complete work.

Format shift

Online grades include an A and B+, while the .

Workload

Light

74/100

Workload appears light to and textbook reading.

Format shift

Online workload concerns come from access issues, while .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is described as friendly and helpful, but one online review reports severe nonresponse and poor organization.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is inconsistent, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention , and exams based on textbook chapters.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework chapters, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person review says the class is easy and the professor is approachable.

Main concern

because lectures may not cover everything tested.

What students said

“POL 101 was an .”
POL101
“ .”
POL101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a and a serious complaint about no communication.

Main concern

Online students may need to work around delayed or missing responses.

What students said

“ .”
POL101
“He is super friendly and will help you pass his course”
POL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support exams based on textbook chapters, with no proof of proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Chapter-Based ExamsTextbook Reading Required

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The chapters, but does not prove closed-book or other exam rules.

Chapter-Based Exams
“ .”
POL101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“POL 101 was an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting teaching, communication, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He is super friendly and will help you pass his course”

⚠️ Online Communication

35/100

“ .”

📘

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is super friendly and will help you pass his course
  • He's very easy to talk with and has no problem working with you.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • POOR communication.
  • .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • POL 101 was an .
  • be sure to read the book because .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, and online opinions conflict, but comments include useful detail across formats.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POL1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values