AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mina Do

MATH155 · MATH114 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself under heavy workload pressure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast pacedHeavy homeworkHard testsUnclear teachingLow recommendation
  • and heavy workload.
  • as hard, fast, and poorly aligned with preparation.
  • One positive online review notes kindness and encouragement, but it is outweighed by repeated negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

An A appears very hard because students report , and .

and heavy work, though one online student earned an A+.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

Entry-level math feels difficult because pacing , and tests do not match preparation well.

Online reviews emphasize disorganization, while in-person reviews emphasize rushed pacing and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance seems important for survival, but because learning came from homework videos.

Online evidence includes a warning that skipping hurts, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because the class feels rushed, exhausting, unclear, and test heavy.

Both formats are mostly negative, with only one online review clearly recommending her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple reviews tag tough grading and .

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and exhausting pacing.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy workload, with in-person reviews stressing same-day work and and lectures.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe rushed, unclear, disorganized teaching despite one positive comment about kindness.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are mixed but mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Comments repeatedly emphasize tests, exam timing, study guide mismatch, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests heavily, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and unclear exam instructions.

Main concern

The pace and workload can make the class hard to manage alongside work or family responsibilities.

What students said

“Goes way too fast”
Math-114
“i've learned nothing in her class and rely and learn from the .”
MATH155

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and reliance on external videos.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while keeping up with and .

What students said

“her class was all over the place, unaccommodating, and she assigns so much HW”
MATH155
“The and did not resemble the study guide at all.”
MATH155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict because students report , and unclear instructions.

Hard TestsTest HeavyFast Exam TimingUnclear Exam Instructions

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and unclear instructions, but do not prove closed-book or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsTest HeavyRushed Exam TimingUnclear Exam Instructions
“gave an only had the weekend to study.”
Math-114
“Sometimes she .”
MATH155

Online

Online reviews describe tests as hard, quick, heavy, and not clearly aligned with study guides, but .

Hard TestsTest HeavyFast Exam TimingStudy Guide Mismatch
“ and if you do not do the HW and lecture/practice, you're dead.”
MATH155
“The and did not resemble the study guide at all.”
MATH155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and did not resemble the study guide at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“her lectures were all over the place.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“VERY EXHAUSTING, i've learned nothing in her class and rely and learn from the .”

🧪

20/100

“Sometimes she .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes way too fast
  • her class was all over the place, unaccommodating
  • she did not teach well and her lectures were all over the place.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • The and did not resemble the study guide at all.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Fit

  • if you are an average student in math.
  • if you !
  • No reason to show up for class at that point

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across both formats are detailed and mostly consistent, though one positive online review creates some conflict.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1555 reviews
Math-1141 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2