AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Hanh Nguyen

CHEM110 · CHEM4 · CHEM111 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Nguyen if you can study consistently and use review materials, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExam ReviewsMixed Teaching QualityTest HeavyExtra Credit
  • Reviews are sharply split, with some students calling Nguyen excellent and others strongly warning against her.
  • Students who succeed often mention , and paying attention in lecture.
  • Exams and experience, but practice and review materials can make them manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be good if students study, do homework, and use reviews, but exams and .

The online review sounds manageable with weekly work, while harsh test outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Chemistry is described as generally difficult, but , and review sessions can make it manageable.

Online evidence suggests the class is manageable, while and difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews , but paying attention in lectures and participating appear important for success.

Online evidence mentions participation and attention, while in-person reviews emphasize lectures, labs, and reviews without a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and , but negative reviews cite unclear teaching and harsh test outcomes.

The only online review is strongly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

She offers and , but test-heavy grading can feel unforgiving to students who perform poorly.

Format shift

Online grading sounds supportive, while and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students mention , and reviews, but most do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online evidence clearly mentions weekly work, while , and labs.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Some students praise her care and examples, while and lectures can be .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while and includes the strongest complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, exams, and a final, making .

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews mention quizzes and tests and the final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for reviews and support but , and explanations.

Main concern

The main risk is unclear explanation and .

What students said

“ but she posts a review and offers a bit of .”
CHEM111
“ ”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive and says the class , and a caring professor.

Main concern

Weekly assignments, lab reports, and .

What students said

“ but pretty easy if you pay attention during lectures and do the HW.”
CHEM110
“She really wants all students to pass and will always do an .”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The frequent quizzes and exams balanced by reviews and practice-based preparation.

Exam ReviewsWeekly QuizzesTough ExamsPractice-Based ExamsFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe , and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Tough ExamsPractice-Based ExamsTests Based On NotesFinal MentionedMany Quizzes
“ but she posts a review and offers a bit of .”
CHEM111
“ and homework.”
CHEM110
“ ”
CHEM4

Online

The online review mentions weekly quizzes and exam reviews but does not .

Weekly QuizzesExam Reviews
“ but pretty easy if you pay attention during lectures and do the HW.”
CHEM110
“will always do an .”
CHEM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but she posts a review and offers a bit of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“The class is generally difficult, but the professor has made it much easier.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“Will be taking her again”

🧪

48/100

“ but she posts a review and offers a bit of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher.
  • pass
  • Her lectures can b boring but she tries the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is generally difficult, but the professor has made it much easier.
  • Easier when you study at least 5 hrs b4 exam day
  • fail you for having a .

Theme 3

📝

  • but pretty easy if you pay attention during lectures and do the HW.
  • .
  • book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews provide useful detail, but the strong split in student experiences lowers certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1103 reviews
CHEM1112 reviews
CHEM42 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1