AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kayvon Sarvi

M112 · MATH112 · MATH80 · TRIG140 · MATH155 · COS126 · MATH60 · LEC20301 · SARVI83215 · STA22964 · MATH140 · MATH22847 · MATH89 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
98.18%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him for math if you want a and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplanationsCaringStudy GuidesHighly RecommendedMakes Math Manageable
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and unusually effective for math.
  • , and lectures closely prepare students for quizzes and exams.
  • The , and studying, especially because math can be hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable with , and study guides, but students still need steady effort.

Online reviews say tests follow homework, while , and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Math content can be challenging, but and prepared notes make it feel much easier.

Both formats say he makes math understandable, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but many students warn that skipping class makes passing harder.

, while online reviews stress watching posted lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost universally recommend him because , and effective at teaching math.

Both formats are strongly positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe reasonable , and some .

Format shift

Online reviews call grading reasonable, while and fair tests.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and sometimes heavy, but students usually describe it as useful and aligned with exams.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus on lectures and tests based on homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise his patience, clarity, humor, care, and ability to make math understandable.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and exam preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize homework-based tests, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, , and exam study guides.

Main concern

because each class covers important material and missing days can cause students to fall behind.

What students said

“He made the material so simple and straight forward.”
MATH112
“Don't skip class because alot is taught each class & you will fall behind.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews praise clear lectures, fast responses, reasonable grading, and .

Main concern

Students still need to watch lectures and study hard to pass.

What students said

“all the questions on the ”
MATH155
“it is important to watch the lectures as they are posted and study very hard in order to pass.”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because , and review materials, but reviews do not clearly prove book or .

Study GuidesHomework-Based TestsNo SurprisesSimilar Test Reviews

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reviews are similar to exams, making the test format predictable.

Study GuidesSimilar Exam ReviewsNo Surprises
“His study guides are similar to the tests and .”
MATH60
“His Study guides are almost exactly like the .”
MATH60

Online

Online reviews say , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or final policy.

Homework-Based TestsClear Test Scope
“all the questions on the ”
MATH155
“There are no ”
MATH60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What can i say about professor Sarvi, If I can give him a higher review I would.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He made the material so simple and straight forward.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If you get the !”

📘

88/100

“His Study guides are almost exactly like the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really wants everyone to understand math by breaking down all the lectures.
  • and concise
  • He made the material so simple and straight forward.
  • he made it so easy!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He is , and passionate about math.
  • He cares about his students and wants you to pass.
  • He is an and seems to want to help you pass the class.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the hw and study the study guide and youll have an A.
  • all the questions on the
  • Don't skip class because alot is taught each class & you will fall behind.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many math courses and several years are detailed, consistent, and overwhelmingly positive.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH14013 reviews
MATH6011 reviews
MATH808 reviews
MATH1127 reviews
MATH1552 reviews
Show 8 more courses
TRIG1402 reviews
COS1261 review
LEC203011 review
M1121 review
MATH228471 review
MATH891 review
SARVI832151 review
STA229641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

12

B+ 3 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5