AI Rate Professor

Microbiology

Stuart Souki

MICRO200 · MICRO20754 · MICRO100 · MICRO20 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online formats because the only online review reports poor guidance and heavy strain.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent in-person instructorSelf-taught online riskDetailed lab lecturesHelpful when askedMicrobiology is difficult
  • , humor, and support.
  • The single online summer review is sharply negative and describes a .
  • Microbiology remains intellectually difficult, but and enjoyable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with study and , but the online review shows heavy effort and confusion.

In-person evidence supports fair effort for strong students, while online evidence suggests a much harder path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Microbiology is explicitly described as very difficult, even when his in-person teaching makes it more understandable.

, but online comments make the difficulty feel much harsher.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, but the online review is negative enough to lower the overall recommendation.

, while the only online review says the and frustrating.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and tests are described as easy if students study, but there is no evidence of .

Format shift

In-person reviews support fair grading, while online .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The online review describes extreme hours and exhaustion, while microbiology.

Format shift

Online workload appears overwhelming, while but manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

In-person teaching is excellent, but the online review reports poor guidance and self-teaching, lowering the blended score.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while online evidence is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, while and course work also appear important.

Format shift

, tests, and lab lectures; online assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are very positive, emphasizing helpfulness, detailed lab lectures, straightforward expectations, and enjoyable teaching.

Main concern

Microbiology is difficult and still requires studying and knowing the material.

What students said

“Micro is very difficult but he made it extremely enjoyable”
MICRO200
“His quizzes and if you study and know what you're doing.”
MICRO20754
“He is very straightforward and tells you what is expected.”
MICRO100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative, describing a , and overwhelming effort.

Main concern

Online students may need to teach themselves and manage a heavy time crunch with limited guidance.

What students said

“Everything .”
MICRO20
“I've spent numerous hours with minimal meals, sleep, and an abundance of notes but still felt lost.”
MICRO20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests that are easy if students study, but do not clearly .

Quizzes And TestsStudy-Based ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests are manageable with studying, but exam policy details are not clearly proven.

Quizzes And TestsStudy-Based Exams
“His quizzes and if you study and know what you're doing.”
MICRO20754

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Micro is very difficult but he made it extremely enjoyable; if i could.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format split, teaching quality, workload, and exam comments. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Dr. Souki is amazing. so detailed.”

⚠️ Online Risk

28/100

“Everything .”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

58/100

“His quizzes and if you study and know what you're doing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very straightforward and tells you what is expected.
  • so detailed.
  • Micro is very difficult but he made it extremely enjoyable

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • Everything .
  • get ahead.
  • Asking for help was more so being lectured or "find it yourself" than guiding a lost student.

Theme 3

📈 About Exams And Difficulty

  • Micro is very difficult but he made it extremely enjoyable
  • His quizzes and if you study and know what you're doing.
  • I've spent numerous hours with minimal meals, sleep, and an abundance of notes but still felt lost.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and the lone online review sharply conflicts with the three older positive in-person reviews.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MICRO1001 review
MICRO201 review
MICRO2001 review
MICRO207541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1