AI Rate Professor

Art

Tracey Weiss

ART121 · ART101 · ART151 · ART150 · ART156L · CERAMICS · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you value hands-on art guidance, but be ready for inconsistent support depending on the class experience.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful when engagedMixed teaching styleCan be rudeFine arts friendlyModerate difficulty
  • Reviews are and very rude experiences.
  • Positive reviews describe a funny, patient art teacher who makes class relaxing.
  • Negative reviews warn that missed demos and questions may not get useful support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

There is little grade evidence, but comments suggest students can do well when they follow demonstrations and complete the art work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The art content is often described as fun and relaxing, though missed demonstrations can make the work harder.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person art studio reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, but missing demonstrations appears to create real problems.

Only in-person reviews mention missed demonstrations, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but the rude-support complaints make the recommendation unreliable.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One recent review tags her as a , but most comments .

Format shift

, and the evidence is limited.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Students describe the class as fun and relaxing, with no .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with strong praise for patience and clarity but serious complaints about rudeness and lack of help.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison available.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews do not clearly define the and studio demonstration concerns.

Format shift

, and it is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are polarized, with and others reporting rude, unhelpful responses.

Main concern

Support can feel inconsistent when students miss demonstrations or ask questions.

What students said

“She's very funny and .”
ART150
“You're on your own!”
ART101
“Always gives good advice when your stuck!”
ART156L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review tagging the class as test heavy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatOne test-heavy tag

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond one test-heavy tag.

One test-heavy tagExam format not clearly proven
“Shes very rude and .”
ART121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a funny and helpful teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching support and class experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She's very funny and .”

⚠️ Support Risk

45/100

“You're on your own!”

👍 Positive Fit

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's the greatest teacher ever.
  • She's very funny and .
  • She is a funny and helpful teacher.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Helpfulness

  • Shes very rude and .
  • You're on your own!
  • Always gives good advice when your stuck!

Theme 3

🎨 About Class Experience

  • It was fun and relaxing and taught extremly well.
  • Nice and friendly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span many years and include consistent polarization, but several are old or vague.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1503 reviews
ART1011 review
ART1211 review
ART1511 review
ART156L1 review
Show 1 more courses
CERAMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1