AI Rate Professor

English

Rebecca Rios

ENLGISH100 · ENGLI100 · ENGLISH52 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENG100AND103 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100ENG103 · ENG100 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if and can handle essays, participation, and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackWriting-heavyCaring teacherRevision opportunitiesMixed online experience
  • Most in-person students praise her as helpful, caring, and effective at improving writing.
  • The course is writing-heavy, but revisions and .
  • The lone online review is strongly negative and reports late assignment posting and poor motivation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with completed essays, participation, and revisions, but late work and writing volume can hurt students.

Online evidence is negative and uncertain on grades, while and earn high grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is not conceptually extreme, but , and word-count work make it a standard writing load.

Online evidence says the writing felt boring and credit-driven, while but useful writing practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation and , but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation and attendance helping students pass, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, and writing improvement, though online experience and strict deadlines reduce confidence.

, while the single online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

She can be firm on late work and grading, but revision opportunities and .

Format shift

Online evidence does not establish grading leniency, while but also chances to revise for .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is writing-heavy with many essays and reading, but students often say it pays off.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests annoying assignment timing, while , and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as , and effective, despite one poor online review and a few mixed comments.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment , and revisions, with fewer exam-focused comments.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both emphasize assignments and writing, while and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing helpful feedback, caring teaching, writing improvement, and fair revision chances.

Main concern

Students , and firm late policies.

What students said

“she doesn't pardon late grades.”
ENGLISH100
“she requires many essays but so u can get a better grade!”
ENG100ENG103

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review , and weak motivation to write.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She be uploading assignments 2-3 days before its due, mad annoying.”
ENGL100
“It doesn't inspire me to write either.”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final content from assigned books, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Straightforward Midterm And FinalReading-Based ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final based on assigned books, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Straightforward Midterm And FinalBook-Based Exams
“MIDTERM and FINAL are straight forward from the 2 interesting books she makes you read!”
ENLGISH100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the reason I passed with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She and !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ ! Trust me”

📝 Writing Workload

45/100

“You have to write a lot but it's English!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor, really looks out to help each student.
  • She actually pays attention to your comments and respects every single one of them.
  • She has an awesome style of teaching.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing And Grades

  • she requires many essays but so u can get a better grade!
  • She does however offer a as long as it's in on time.
  • though, but I somehow passed it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Concerns

  • She be uploading assignments 2-3 days before its due, mad annoying.
  • Take the class if you want to read books and regurgitate what's said in .
  • Just be aware that she doesn't pardon late grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is credible because 13 reviews span many years and contain detailed, repeated themes, though only one online review limits online confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENGLI1002 reviews
ENG100AND1031 review
ENG100ENG1031 review
ENGL1001 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGL1031 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH521 review
ENLGISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1