AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Ernest Lew

CA260 · CA265 · CA120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a fair culinary instructor with and strong grade support.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear criteriaHelpful instructorEasy gradingExtra creditBook-dependent
  • Students describe Ernest Lew as , and easy to pass with effort.
  • , and , with mostly manageable work.
  • The small review count makes the positive pattern promising but less certain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A grades look very attainable because all reported grades are A or A+ and , and second quiz attempts.

Online reviews provide most of the Easy A evidence, while the low difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

77/100

The material can be boring or book-dependent, but students describe the class as manageable with and helpful support.

Online reviews mention structured quizzes, exams, and guides, while the but manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , though one online review mentions for attending a recruiting lecture.

Online evidence mentions one optional extra-credit lecture, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

because , and makes the class manageable.

Both formats are positive, but online evidence is more detailed than the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Reported grades are all A-range, and comments mention , and .

Format shift

, while the in-person review supports low difficulty and few graded items.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work includes quizzes, exams, discussions, and projects, but students describe it as easier and manageable.

Format shift

Online work is structured and recurring, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe him as , and able to move students through dull material.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize responsiveness and support, while the and classroom pacing.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include quizzes, exams, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the assessment evidence; the few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but funny instructor who keeps boring material manageable.

Main concern

The material can feel boring even when the professor gets students through it.

What students said

“Of course most of the material is boring but Chef Lew will get the class through it with some dry humor and in-jokes with the class.”
CA260

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a or exams, study guides, and extra credit.

Main concern

Students may need the book and should keep up with , and projects.

What students said

“Weekly quiz, 2 chances for each.”
CA265
“He gives study guides as .”
CA120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz evidence sounds student-friendly because reviews mention study guides and .

Weekly QuizTwo AttemptsStudy GuidesChapter Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , final, open-book, or proctoring policies.

Online

and chapter exams with study guides, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Weekly QuizTwo AttemptsStudy GuidesChapter Exams
“Weekly quiz, 2 chances for each.”
CA265
“There was an exam for every 2-3 Chapters of the book and discussions as well.”
CA120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great! . Had during pandemic in summer so class was a bit easier.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ timely manner, fair grading.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“Great! .”

⚖️

90/100

“Weekly quiz, 2 chances for each.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chef Lew will get the class through it with some dry humor and in-jokes with the class.
  • timely manner, fair grading.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Had during pandemic in summer so class was a bit easier.
  • Weekly quiz, 2 chances for each.
  • He gives study guides as .

Theme 3

📚 About Materials

  • Only bought Book of Yields, didn't really need it, but .
  • You can't depend on the lectures to get you through the class you need the book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and although they are consistent and detailed, the sample is too small for high certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CA1201 review
CA2601 review
CA2651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values