AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Minh Can

MATH140 · MATH114 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Can is a reasonable choice if you can handle lots of homework and some self-teaching for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkLenient gradingSelf-teaching neededAccessible outside classPearson access needed
  • Both reviews mention lots of homework, but one says it is not the main grade driver.
  • Students describe him as approachable or cool, but .
  • The small review count makes the rating low confidence despite a fairly balanced experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Leniency helps, but lots of homework and self-teaching keep the A from being effortless.

Online evidence points to lenient grading, while but heavy Pearson homework.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

One student rated the in-person class very easy, but who need guidance.

Online evidence is too thin on content difficulty, while but self-taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , though the in-person review mentions camera and mic preferences for remote meetings.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation is split because students appreciate leniency but and .

The , while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

One online student directly says he gives leniency and that .

Format shift

Online evidence supports leniency, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Both reviews explicitly mention lots of .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

He seems approachable, but one student says he works problems without explaining thoroughly.

Format shift

Online feedback is warmer, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The clearest assessment evidence is heavy homework through MyMathLab, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes easy difficulty but and .

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while .

What students said

“be prepared to teach yourself”
MATH140
“LOTS of have access code”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises his leniency but still notes lots of homework.

Main concern

if .

What students said

“lots of homework but thats the least of our grades”
MATH114
“gives leniency”
MATH114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“be prepared to teach yourself”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“will review problems you have questions on but ”

📚 Workload

30/100

“LOTS of have access code”

⚖️

72/100

“He understands that school isnt always a top priority for students and gives leniency”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he more so does his lectures and teaching as if he is just doing math problems on his own
  • will review problems you have questions on but
  • Funny guy.

Theme 2

📚

  • LOTS of have access code
  • lots of homework but thats the least of our grades

Theme 3

⚖️

  • gives leniency
  • lots of homework but thats the least of our grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so conclusions are useful but not stable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1141 review
MATH1401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1