AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Margaret Hohly

CIS101 · CIS155 · CIS271 · CIS211C · CIS102 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning independently and handling communication or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationDisrespectful toneFast lecturesGrading errorsMixed helpfulness
  • Most reviews , and disrespectful interactions.
  • Online reviews are especially negative, with complaints about grade errors and poor responsiveness.
  • A , but the overall pattern is risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A is not clearly easy because students , and frustration even when performance is strong.

Online evidence shows grading problems, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The CIS content can be manageable, but fast lectures and weak support make it harder than the course level suggests.

Online reviews focus on administration problems, while and feeling lost.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict or .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because of disrespectful interactions, poor communication, and .

Online reviews are strongly negative, and in-person reviews are mixed but mostly warn against taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report and unfair grade handling rather than a .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the , while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but , and self-management still matter.

Format shift

Online workload details are limited, while in-person comments mention textbook assessments and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A minority praise her knowledge, but most comments describe poor communication, fast pacing, and disrespectful treatment.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mainly criticized through communication issues, while in-person comments focus on tone and pace.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention computer grading, textbook assessments, and .

Format shift

, while in-person evidence mentions assessments and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but leans negative, with several students saying she talks down to students and lectures too fast.

Main concern

Many students felt disrespected or unsupported when asking questions.

What students said

“Make you feel dumb if asked questions.”
CIS271
“She lectures too fast, and expects everyone to keep up with her.”
CIS102

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews strongly criticize grading mistakes, poor communication, and unfair treatment.

Main concern

Students report grade errors and very frustrating communication.

What students said

“Teacher seemed wildly irresponsible as she made .”
CIS101
“lazy, she will prejudice your grade. .”
CIS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and open book, but broader exam policy is not well proven.

Open Note QuizzesOpen Book Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and open book quizzes, but does not clearly prove midterm or .

Open Note QuizzesOpen Book Quizzes
“ ”
CIS102

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Make you feel dumb if asked questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She lectures too fast, and expects everyone to keep up with her.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

25/100

“With !!”

📉

25/100

“Teacher seemed wildly irresponsible as she made .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures too fast, and expects everyone to keep up with her.
  • Ms. Hohly is an excellent teacher.
  • Mrs Hohly is the and caring wants her students to succeed in class.

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • if you cared to e-mail her.
  • .
  • With !!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Respect and Grading

  • Make you feel dumb if asked questions.
  • Talks down to you and treats you like dirt.
  • Teacher seemed wildly irresponsible as she made .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years show consistent negative themes, but several are old and some format labels conflict with the review text.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CIS1025 reviews
CIS1014 reviews
CIS1551 review
CIS211C1 review
CIS2711 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values