AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Stephanie Pullman

CD110 · CDEC111 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with group work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveGroup-work heavyClear gradingOrganizedEasy A with effort
  • Students consistently describe Pullman as , and easy to follow.
  • Grades are very strong when students complete the group work and assignments.
  • The main tradeoff is frequent group work and a noticeable amount of tasks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic if students complete the work, especially the group assignments.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students say the work is easy and learning feels smooth, though the amount of group work adds effort.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because much of the work happens through group participation, but strict penalties are not clearly described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and wants students to pass.

All , and it is consistently enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Grades appear lenient when students turn in all required work, with four A+ grades and one A reported.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The work is not described as hard, but students repeatedly mention many tasks and heavy group work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and easy to learn from.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize group work, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are uniformly positive, with students praising , and manageable work.

Main concern

The course depends heavily on group work and can include many tasks.

What students said

“She really wants you to pass the class.”
CDEC111
“The work isn't hard, but there is just a lot to do .”
CD110
“Complete all of your work and you should be able to pass her class with an A.”
CD110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really wants you to pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Somebody I would always want to be my professor.”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“Complete all of your work and you should be able to pass her class with an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and was interested in getting to know her students.
  • and .
  • Kept it very interesting and actually learned with ease.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Everything is based off group work.
  • The work isn't hard, but there is just a lot to do .
  • Majority of the work is group based, so .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Turn in all your work and you'll be just fine!
  • Complete all of your work and you should be able to pass her class with an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but , though there is no online evidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1103 reviews
CDEC1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values