AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hai Phu Ngo

MATH40 · STATS112 · MATH80 · MATH116 · MATH60 · 80A · STAT112 · MATH140 · MATH75 · PRECALCULUS101 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are already very strong in math and can teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandTest heavyTough graderFast lecturesNot helpful
  • and poor help when students ask questions.
  • , and grading by few items.
  • The experience is especially risky for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and .

The online review is negative but sparse, while and poor grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The math content feels much harder because , and often require independent learning.

, but the in-person evidence is much stronger and more detailed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Tags repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts your chance to pass, even though many students found class unhelpful.

Attendance pressure is documented mainly in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend him because , and harsh tests.

Both online and the strongest pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call him a and items.

Format shift

and also appears in the single online review tag.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is not described as massive, but , and self-study make the course feel heavy.

Format shift

Both formats mention test-heavy pressure, while the and self-study.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most students say , and reacts badly to questions.

Format shift

The online review reports ignored questions, while and unsupportive teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the course as things.

Format shift

Both online and and quizzes as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently report fast , and little support.

Main concern

Students describe poor teaching support and .

What students said

“He only wrote on the board and if you didn't get it then oh well.”
PRECALCULUS101
“There are no study guides and .”
MATH116
“This class is HYPER FAST!”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and says questions were ignored.

Main concern

Students may .

What students said

“When the class and I tried asking him a question he completely ignores us.”
MATH75
“DONT WASTE YOUR TIME WITH THIS GUY.”
MATH75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove book policy, webcam use, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesHardest ProblemsFew Grade Items

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and very hard problems, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyHardest ProblemsFew Grade Items
“There are no study guides and .”
MATH116
“Even if you do study he picks the hardest most possible scenario or problems that he doesnt go over and give it too you.”
MATH80

Online

The online review mentions pop quizzes and but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH75
“Test heavy”
MATH75

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if he fits your schedule.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He only wrote on the board and if you didn't get it then oh well.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ learn.”

⚖️

10/100

“There are no study guides and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Doesnt teach you anything might as well stay home and study because what he lectured isnt on the test.
  • Strong accent, as well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You won't pass him if you're not extremely advanced and independent.
  • This class is HYPER FAST!
  • READ THE BOOK. HARD CLASS. .

Theme 3

❓ About Helpfulness

  • He is not help outside of class, and gets upset if you ask a question.
  • When the class and I tried asking him a question he completely ignores us.
  • Not even willing to work with students who are clearly giving their all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 17 reviews over several years show a consistent negative pattern with detailed examples.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH805 reviews
MATH603 reviews
STATS1122 reviews
80A1 review
MATH1161 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1401 review
MATH401 review
MATH751 review
PRECALCULUS1011 review
STAT1121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C- 2

D range

3

D 2 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 4