AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Hicks

ENG52SUMMER · ENGLISH52 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENG52 · ENGL52100 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · ENGL52 · ENG103 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you want an engaging teacher who can improve your writing, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots Of Reading And WritingEngaging DiscussionsCaring But InconsistentSlow Feedback
  • Many students love her energy, honesty, and ability to make English engaging.
  • Grades require real effort because reviews repeatedly , and homework.
  • A meaningful minority , and off-topic or disorganized classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say she is a and requires , and persistence.

Online and , while in-person reviews give much stronger evidence of heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The material is not impossible, but the writing expectations, reading load, and .

Online reviews are mixed, while and writing workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but participation and class discussions appear important to the experience.

In-person reviews emphasize participation and discussions, while online reviews do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend her for growth and engagement, but communication, organization, and .

, while online reviews are sharply split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call her a and compositions, even when they respect her teaching.

Format shift

Both online and providing more examples.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews frequently , and homework.

Format shift

, while one online review also reports many discussions, journals, and compositions.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students find her caring, funny, insightful, and motivating, but several describe her as .

Format shift

In-person reviews are mostly positive but mixed, while online reviews are split between praise and serious communication complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment evidence , and reading rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward writing-based assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly praise her as funny, caring, and engaging, but they also and writing, and delayed feedback.

Main concern

Students who need structure, quick grading, and .

What students said

“shes a but she will work with you!”
ENGLISH100
“Be prepared to do a lot of reading and writing though.”
ENGLISH103
“She takes , so it is difficult to know your grade.”
ENGLISH100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between one severe complaint about poor communication and one strong praise for helpful conferences and manageable difficulty.

Main concern

Online students and inconsistent communication.

What students said

“does not respond to emails, grades rough, always changing requirements of assignments.”
ENGLISH100
“She a looking for a great thesis statement, but will try to help you by scheduling a conference with you.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals, so .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, midterms, finals, or proctoring policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work for your high grade but at the same time motivates you to aim for an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is a but you will learn a lot.”

⚖️

28/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Be prepared to do a lot of reading and writing though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares about her students and wants us to succeed.
  • She made me want to put my 100% shes a but she will work with you!
  • She is very straight forward and very involved with the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She makes you work for your high grade but at the same time motivates you to aim for an A!
  • She is a , but if you want to be better prepared for the .
  • She is a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization And Feedback

  • does not respond to emails, grades rough, always changing requirements of assignments.
  • She does not return work in a timely matter or .
  • She takes , so it is difficult to know your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across several years give detailed and consistent themes, though student opinions are meaningfully divided.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGLISH1007 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
ENGL524 reviews
ENG523 reviews
ENGLISH523 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG1001 review
ENG52SUMMER1 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL521001 review
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 8

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1