AI Rate Professor

Reading

Robert Renteria

READING · READ40 · READ2013 · READ200 · READ42 · READI54 · READING54 · READING43 · READ4354 · READ54 · HOME2063 · READ43 · READI43 · INST100 · READ3219 · READ · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are willing to handle strict rules, heavy reading, constant homework, and a highly demanding style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery heavy homeworkTough gradingStrict rulesUnclear instructionsPolarizing teaching
  • Many students describe heavy daily work, strict rules, and no late-work tolerance.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply polarized, but recent online reviews are strongly negative.
  • Students who like structure may learn, but most comments warn that the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned strong grades, but comments repeatedly say grades require , and no late work.

Online reviews make the A sound , while in-person reviews show some students can earn good grades through strict compliance.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material itself is reading-based, but fast pacing, complex phonics, and .

Online difficulty comes from confusing instructions, while , and classroom expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students say attendance matters because , and .

In-person reviews provide the clearest attendance evidence, while online and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most comments warn against taking him because of , and poor student support.

Online reviews are strongly avoidant, while and a smaller group of defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, nitpicking, no late work, and penalties for small mistakes.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize nitpicky grading and , while .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Many reviews describe daily homework, lots of reading, many papers, and workloads that conflict with other classes or jobs.

Format shift

Online reviews cite almost daily homework, while and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students say they learned a lot, but many describe him as life lectures than reading.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly negative, while and very poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize homework, reading, vocabulary, papers, and assignments more than exams, though midterm and .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on assignments, while , and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but repeatedly , and strong opinions about his style.

Main concern

The workload and .

What students said

“Gosh..this prof is so hard.. i had to drop all 3 other subj. coz im failing all of them.”
READ54
“HE IS NOT HARD AT ALL YOU DO HAVE TO ATTEND CLASS BECAUSE ”
READ200

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing , and .

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“He's so complicated. and . ”
READ200
“there's one due almost everyday! as much as possible.”
READ200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

MidtermFinalHomework-Driven Course

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention studying for a midterm and final, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

MidtermFinal
“study hard for midterm and final.”
READ54

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is by far the career as a student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“there's one due almost everyday! as much as possible.”

⚖️

18/100

“he dings you if you made a mistake especially if you forget a comma or period.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Mr Renteria is not a good teacher. .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • reading and !
  • !
  • he keep on giving too much work.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • he loves to just ding you for.
  • he never accept late homework (even 1 min).
  • watch for your grade he almost messed mine up.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and only once.
  • He does preach instead of teaching.
  • YOU'LL ACTUALLY LEARN IN HIS CLASS, WHICH IS WHY I'M GOING TO COLLEGE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews across many years, with , and teaching style despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 516

Course coverage

READ5413 reviews
READ20011 reviews
READING548 reviews
READING433 reviews
READ422 reviews
Show 11 more courses
READI432 reviews
READING2 reviews
HOME20631 review
INST1001 review
READ1 review
READ20131 review
READ32191 review
READ401 review
READ431 review
READ43541 review
READI541 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1