AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jacquelyn Troup

SOC120 · SOCI101 · SOC101SOC225 · SOC101 · SOC100 · SOCIOLOGY210 · SOC200 · SOC250 · SOC201 · 172 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
21.05%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-topic lecturesSelf-taught classTest heavyUnclear examsNice but ineffective
  • Most students say lectures frequently go off topic and do not teach the tested material.
  • , and self-teaching.
  • A minority found her funny, caring, or easy if they read, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A , but many report hard exams, unclear expectations, withdrawals, and self-teaching.

Online evidence is split between an easy-A comment and a severe warning, while and high risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The subject , and exams that students say do not match instruction.

, while the two online reviews are too limited and conflicting to change the overall pattern.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

but not reliably valuable because many students say class time is off topic and reading matters more.

In-person comments mention showing up and lecture-heavy class, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because and .

, while online reviews are too few and split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews , and grades depending heavily on exams.

Format shift

, while online evidence includes one easy extra-credit experience and one harsh test complaint.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework is often light, but the , and self-teaching for exams.

Format shift

but , while online evidence is too limited to generalize.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly say she goes , and leaves them to teach themselves.

Format shift

, while online reviews are mixed but limited.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are commonly described as .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, with grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, repeatedly describing off-topic , and heavy self-teaching.

Main concern

Students often feel unprepared because .

What students said

“You basically have to teach yourself with the textbook and the study guide.”
SOC101
“ lectures.”
SOC101
“ !!!”
SOC101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is mixed, with one and one easy-A review tied to .

Main concern

Online reviews conflict, but the negative review warns that .

What students said

“ !!!!!”
SOC120
“loved her!!!!!!! she was my only A.”
SOC100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students often describe them as , and poorly aligned with lectures.

Test HeavyEssay TestsFew Graded ItemsTake-Home Tests MentionedUnclear Exam Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests in some sections, and poor alignment between tests and lectures, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Essay TestsTake-Home Tests MentionedHard ExamsTests Do Not Match Lectures
“ .”
SOC101
“ !”
SOC250
“The !”
SOC101

Online

Online reviews mention write-in tests about class discussion and one easy extra-credit experience, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Write-In AnswersExtra Credit Mentioned
“ we talked about in class.”
SOC120
“go to ur extra credits and you will pass”
SOC100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You basically have to teach yourself with the textbook and the study guide.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

22/100

“She completely gets sidetracked during lectures.”

Recommendation Risk

24/100

“If you can get out of her class, DO IT!”

25/100

“The !”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She goes off topic way to much to talk about her personal life.
  • She constantly goes off topic, her tests are total opposites of what we went over in class.
  • She gets off topic more than any other teacher I've had.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • Goes off topic, grades .
  • The ONLY way to pass this class is by reading every chapter about 2 times a week.

Theme 3

Student Warnings

  • if it's your last option.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

172

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over several years provide detailed and consistent evidence, though opinions include a small positive minority.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 547
4 out of 520
3 out of 522
2 out of 532
1 out of 551

Course coverage

SOC10135 reviews
SOC2015 reviews
SOC1002 reviews
SOC1202 reviews
1011 review
Show 5 more courses
SOC101SOC2251 review
SOC2001 review
SOC2501 review
SOCI1011 review
SOCIOLOGY2101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 4 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1